Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 22, 2016·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Carolina Hurricanes 3, Philadelphia Flyers 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR06313011330
PHI0641427627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:50CARJustin FaulkPPAssists: Sebastian Aho, Teuvo Teravainen · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:07CARJordan StaalAssists: Joakim Nordstrom, Sebastian Aho · Snap, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:50PHIBrandon ManningAssists: Jakub Voracek · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:19PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Ivan Provorov, Travis Konecny · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:51PHIMatt ReadAssists: Ivan Provorov, Sean Couturier · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:17PHIShayne GostisbehereGWGAssists: Andrew MacDonald, Wayne Simmonds · Snap, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P2 18:54CARLee StempniakAssists: Victor Rask, Jeff Skinner · Snap, 0.16 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:50PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Shayne Gostisbehere, Claude Giroux · Snap, 0.41 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:33PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Nick Schultz, Chris VandeVelde · Snap, 0.05 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:06PHITravis Konecny: Charging2 min
  2. P1 9:06CARBryan Bickell: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 19:19PHIWayne Simmonds: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:30PHIAndrew MacDonald: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 13:50CARKlas Dahlbeck: Interference2 min
  6. P3 6:30CARNoah Hanifin: Holding2 min
  7. P3 6:56PHIMark Streit: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 10:35CARNoah Hanifin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 12:27PHIMark Streit: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 19:01PHIWayne Simmonds: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 19:01CARJeff Skinner: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
44% to win56% to win
← CAR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Bellemare
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARPHI
30Shots on goal27
3.0Expected goals3.0
65Shot attempts52
30Faceoffs won29
5Power plays4
10Penalty minutes12
19Hits13
10Blocked shots23
9Giveaways9
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestDi Giuseppe – Teravainen – Lindholm7:32

    xG 0.44–0.11 (80%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Nordstrom – Aho9:01

    xG 0.41–0.18 (69%)attempts 9–5goals 1–1

  3. Stempniak – Skinner – Rask10:47

    xG 0.55–0.41 (57%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  4. McClement – Bickell – Stalberg6:03

    xG 0.04–0.33 (11%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHainsey – Faulk11:32

    xG 0.90–0.53 (63%)attempts 13–14goals 1–2

  2. Dahlbeck – Hanifin10:36

    xG 0.54–0.24 (69%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  3. Slavin – Pesce14:20

    xG 0.43–0.31 (58%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGordon – VandeVelde – Lyubimov2:46

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Read – Cousins – Bellemare7:53

    xG 0.10–0.13 (43%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Giroux – Simmonds – Schenn10:23

    xG 0.23–0.67 (25%)attempts 6–13goals 1–1

  4. Voracek – Couturier – Konecny10:52

    xG 0.42–1.22 (26%)attempts 11–17goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. Manning – Provorov11:33

    xG 0.39–0.62 (39%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  2. Streit – Schultz14:00

    xG 0.29–0.53 (35%)attempts 8–16goals 0–1

  3. MacDonald – Gostisbehere11:41

    xG 0.20–0.91 (18%)attempts 8–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.0 xGCAR 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #174 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.66 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 52% of the time.

PHI winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).