Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 22, 2016·United Center, Chicago

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Chicago Blackhawks 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TOR19211113011434
CHI15112213052535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:36CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Artemi Panarin, Patrick Kane · Snap, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:46TORTyler BozakAssists: Jake Gardiner, Mitch Marner · Deflected, 0.26 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:28TORWilliam NylanderPPAssists: Auston Matthews, Nikita Zaitsev · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:08CHITyler MotteAssists: Brian Campbell, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.43 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:16TORJames van RiemsdykUnassisted · Snap, 0.27 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:46TORWilliam NylanderAssists: Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.29 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:32CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Brian Campbell, Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.25 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:32CHIRichard PanikAssists: Duncan Keith, Brian Campbell · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  2. 2. TOR Peter Holland stopped
  3. 3. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  4. 4. TOR Auston Matthews scored
  5. 5. CHI Artemi Panarin scored
  6. 6. TOR Mitch Marner stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 15:42TORPeter Holland: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 4:40TORNazem Kadri: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 7:50CHIMarcus Kruger: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:45TORRoman Polak: Interference2 min
  5. P2 15:36TORConnor Carrick: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 13:00CHINiklas Hjalmarsson: Tripping2 min
  7. OT 0:32TORJames van Riemsdyk: High sticking2 min
  8. OT 4:20TORMitch Marner: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
44% to win56% to win
← TOR attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Anisimov won the faceoff against Bozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORCHI
34Shots on goal35
3.2Expected goals4.1
52Shot attempts73
35Faceoffs won40
2Power plays6
12Penalty minutes4
27Hits12
24Blocked shots11
6Giveaways10
3Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestvan Riemsdyk – Bozak – Marner11:59

    xG 0.66–0.19 (78%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  2. Hyman – Nylander – Matthews11:05

    xG 0.74–0.43 (63%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  3. Martin – Holland – Brown6:53

    xG 0.15–0.60 (20%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  4. Michalek – Komarov – Kadri10:17

    xG 0.10–0.74 (12%)attempts 3–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Gardiner4:30

    xG 0.54–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  2. Polak – Rielly9:26

    xG 0.64–0.39 (62%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Rielly – Carrick4:10

    xG 0.28–0.18 (61%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestTootoo – Rasmussen – Schmaltz4:39

    xG 0.44–0.03 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Panik – Motte12:28

    xG 0.66–0.32 (67%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  3. Anisimov – Kane – Panarin11:24

    xG 0.32–0.21 (60%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  4. Hossa – Kruger – Hartman6:15

    xG 0.14–0.20 (41%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Keith13:10

    xG 0.76–0.19 (80%)attempts 11–6goals 2–0

  2. Seabrook – Kempny10:24

    xG 0.61–0.37 (62%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Hjalmarsson2:35

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.1 xGTOR 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHITOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #33 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.55 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).