Sun, Nov 6, 2016·Joe Louis Arena, Detroit
Edmonton Oilers 2, Detroit Red Wings 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 54% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 113 | 110 | 05 | 228 |
| DET | 112 | 07 | 04 | 123 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:53DETJustin AbdelkaderPPAssists: Brendan Smith, Frans Nielsen · Wrist, 0.45 xG0–1
- P1 16:39EDMTyler PitlickAssists: Milan Lucic, Leon Draisaitl · Wrap-around, 0.16 xG1–1
- P2 19:40EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsPPGWGAssists: Connor McDavid, Oscar Klefbom · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
Penalties (4)
- P1 7:47EDMEric Gryba: Interference2 min · PPG
- P2 17:04DETDylan Larkin: Interference2 min
- P2 19:32DETMike Green: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 1:36EDMDarnell Nurse: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Nielsen
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Edmonton Oilers
Forward lines
- bestLucic – Pitlick – Draisaitl13:37
xG 0.71–0.14 (83%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0
- Maroon – Eberle – McDavid12:07
xG 0.66–0.47 (58%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0
- Pouliot – Letestu – Nugent-Hopkins11:21
xG 0.28–0.14 (66%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0
- Lander – Beck – Slepyshev6:59
xG 0.08–0.06 (60%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestLarsson – Klefbom19:02
xG 0.79–0.34 (70%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0
- Gryba – Nurse16:45
xG 0.34–0.17 (67%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0
- Sekera – Benning12:55
xG 0.52–0.41 (56%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0
Detroit Red Wings
Forward lines
- bestAbdelkader – Helm – Sheahan10:42
xG 0.35–0.25 (58%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0
- Ott – Miller – Glendening3:41
xG 0.10–0.22 (31%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1
- Nielsen – Nyquist – Larkin12:49
xG 0.16–0.31 (34%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0
- Zetterberg – Tatar – Athanasiou11:18
xG 0.07–0.36 (17%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Green – DeKeyser19:01
xG 0.49–0.62 (44%)attempts 21–12goals 0–0
- Ericsson – Marchenko12:58
xG 0.14–0.40 (26%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0
- Kronwall – Smith15:45
xG 0.21–0.66 (24%)attempts 9–16goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
DET's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DET is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 54% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (DET − EDM), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).