Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 20, 2016·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Winnipeg Jets 1, Carolina Hurricanes 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 71% of the time.

CAR winsWPG wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WPG01108110129
CAR11807215340

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:45CARElias LindholmAssists: Ron Hainsey · Snap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P3 2:39CARVictor RaskPPGWGAssists: Lee Stempniak, Jeff Skinner · Snap, 0.23 xG0–2
  3. P3 9:33WPGMark ScheifeleAssists: Nikolaj Ehlers, Josh Morrissey · Snap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P3 18:17CARNoah HanifinPPAssists: Justin Faulk, Teuvo Teravainen · Slap, 0.04 xG1–3
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:11WPGChris Thorburn: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 9:26CARJoakim Nordstrom: Interference2 min
  3. P1 19:06WPGJacob Trouba: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 0:08CARNoah Hanifin: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 7:00WPGAndrew Copp: Interference2 min
  6. P2 12:56CARLee Stempniak: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 12:56WPGChris Thorburn: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 19:20WPGDustin Byfuglien: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 19:20CARTeuvo Teravainen: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:20WPGMark Scheifele: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 1:50WPGMark Stuart: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 10:39WPGNic Petan: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 13:10CARViktor Stalberg: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 17:39WPGPatrik Laine: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WPG00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
44% to win56% to win
← WPG attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Scheifele won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WPGCAR
29Shots on goal40
2.4Expected goals3.7
49Shot attempts70
23Faceoffs won36
3Power plays7
18Penalty minutes10
51Hits32
18Blocked shots10
11Giveaways9
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestLowry – Copp – Laine7:13

    xG 0.44–0.22 (67%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  2. Thorburn – Howden – Burmistrov3:22

    xG 0.17–0.13 (57%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Dano – Petan – Tanev7:04

    xG 0.05–0.14 (26%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Wheeler – Scheifele – Ehlers11:37

    xG 0.76–0.91 (45%)attempts 10–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestByfuglien – Morrissey13:20

    xG 0.86–0.69 (55%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Enstrom – Trouba12:08

    xG 0.48–0.45 (52%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

  3. Stuart – Chiarot7:35

    xG 0.13–0.38 (25%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestRask – Teravainen – Lindholm7:43

    xG 0.43–0.19 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. McClement – Stalberg – Nordstrom7:09

    xG 0.25–0.08 (76%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Stempniak – McGinn – Ryan4:27

    xG 0.09–0.04 (67%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Skinner – Aho9:57

    xG 0.30–0.97 (24%)attempts 8–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestTennyson – Hanifin8:55

    xG 0.41–0.12 (78%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Hainsey – Faulk13:31

    xG 0.93–0.73 (56%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  3. Hainsey – Tennyson2:11

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.7 xGWPG 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARWPG

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it WPG. Dots are goals.

Excitement 17/100 · #1005 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.81 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
WPG 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 71% of the time.

CAR winsWPG wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − WPG), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).