Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 22, 2016·Honda Center, Anaheim

New York Islanders 3, Anaheim Ducks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.

ANA winsNYI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NYI210012012015335
ANA11201319074241

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:04ANACam FowlerPPAssists: Ryan Getzlaf · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:51NYIAdam PelechAssists: Calvin de Haan, Josh Bailey · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:42NYIJosh BaileyPPAssists: John Tavares, Nick Leddy · Slap, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P3 9:08ANARickard RakellAssists: Corey Perry, Cam Fowler · Slap, 0.06 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Jakob Silfverberg stopped
  2. 2. NYI Andrew Ladd stopped
  3. 3. ANA Corey Perry stopped
  4. 4. NYI Brock Nelson stopped
  5. 5. ANA Ryan Getzlaf stopped
  6. 6. NYI Josh Bailey stopped
  7. 7. ANA Rickard Rakell scored
  8. 8. NYI John Tavares scored
  9. 9. ANA Ryan Kesler stopped
  10. 10. NYI Alan Quine stopped
  11. 11. ANA Cam Fowler scored
  12. 12. NYI Ryan Strome scored
  13. 13. ANA Antoine Vermette stopped
  14. 14. NYI Casey Cizikas stopped
  15. 15. ANA Ondrej Kase scored
  16. 16. NYI Nikolay Kulemin scored
  17. 17. ANA Hampus Lindholm stopped
  18. 18. NYI Jason Chimera stopped
  19. 19. ANA Nick Ritchie stopped
  20. 20. NYI Anders Lee stopped
  21. 21. ANA Andrew Cogliano stopped
  22. 22. NYI Anthony Beauvillier stopped
  23. 23. ANA Shea Theodore scored
  24. 24. NYI Thomas Hickey scored
  25. 25. ANA Ryan Garbutt stopped
  26. 26. NYI Johnny Boychuk stopped
  27. 27. ANA Kevin Bieksa stopped
  28. 28. NYI Nick Leddy scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:38NYIAnthony Beauvillier: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:04NYICalvin de Haan: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 15:17ANASami Vatanen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 3:09ANAJakob Silfverberg: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 14:32ANAOndrej Kase: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 0:32ANARyan Getzlaf: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 16:38ANANick Ritchie: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
44% to win56% to win
← NYI attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Cizikas
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYIANA
35Shots on goal41
2.7Expected goals3.0
58Shot attempts71
33Faceoffs won38
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
28Hits21
14Blocked shots11
8Giveaways10
0Takeaways0

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. bestBailey – Tavares – Beauvillier11:41

    xG 0.59–0.43 (57%)attempts 10–14goals 1–0

  2. Chimera – Lee – Quine5:35

    xG 0.23–0.14 (63%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Lee – Nelson – Strome3:40

    xG 0.10–0.06 (63%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Ladd – Clutterbuck – Cizikas3:32

    xG 0.02–0.11 (12%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hamonic – Leddy13:30

    xG 0.52–0.50 (51%)attempts 8–15goals 0–0

  2. Boychuk – Hickey14:49

    xG 0.24–0.30 (45%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

  3. de Haan – Pelech14:36

    xG 0.34–0.67 (34%)attempts 11–18goals 1–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Ritchie – Kase11:11

    xG 0.59–0.29 (67%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Rakell14:59

    xG 0.32–0.16 (67%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Boll – Wagner – Garbutt4:52

    xG 0.29–0.17 (63%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg11:18

    xG 0.51–0.48 (52%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVatanen – Fowler3:03

    xG 0.23–0.02 (94%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Fowler – Theodore2:17

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Manson2:46

    xG 0.22–0.07 (75%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.0 xGNYI 2.7 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANANYI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it NYI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #367 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
NYI 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 56% of the time.

ANA winsNYI wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − NYI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).