Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 23, 2016·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Philadelphia Flyers 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI0222207231
TBL1120938429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:57TBLVictor HedmanPPAssists: Ondrej Palat, Brayden Point · Slap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:06PHIDale WeiseAssists: Chris VandeVelde, Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:05PHIIvan ProvorovAssists: Matt Read, Mark Streit · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P3 13:28TBLAlex KillornAssists: Slater Koekkoek, Vladislav Namestnikov · Backhand, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:40TBLRyan CallahanGWGAssists: Brayden Point, Tyler Johnson · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:45TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 5:12TBLNikita Nesterov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 9:49PHIClaude Giroux: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 13:38PHINick Cousins: Boarding2 min
  4. P1 18:18PHITravis Konecny: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:24TBLErik Condra: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 13:39TBLRyan Callahan: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 14:16PHIWayne Simmonds: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 2:46PHIJakub Voracek: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 6:04PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Interference2 min
  10. P3 9:26PHIClaude Giroux: Holding2 min
  11. P3 15:01TBLRyan Callahan: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
44% to win56% to win
← PHI attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Filppula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHITBL
31Shots on goal29
1.8Expected goals2.9
56Shot attempts64
38Faceoffs won36
4Power plays7
14Penalty minutes8
24Hits19
21Blocked shots13
6Giveaways12
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVandeVelde – Weise – Laughton5:10

    xG 0.27–0.18 (60%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  2. Simmonds – Cousins – Konecny7:28

    xG 0.13–0.30 (31%)attempts 9–10goals 0–1

  3. Read – Raffl – Bellemare6:25

    xG 0.12–0.29 (29%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Schenn11:02

    xG 0.07–0.35 (17%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Manning – Gudas10:22

    xG 0.39–0.39 (50%)attempts 12–5goals 0–1

  2. Streit – Provorov9:59

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 10–6goals 2–1

  3. MacDonald – Gostisbehere11:35

    xG 0.17–0.41 (29%)attempts 8–19goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestFilppula – Palat – Drouin9:33

    xG 0.40–0.15 (73%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Callahan – Johnson – Point5:38

    xG 0.28–0.08 (78%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  3. Killorn – Kucherov – Namestnikov8:40

    xG 0.27–0.17 (61%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  4. Callahan – Condra – Paquette4:21

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Sustr8:12

    xG 0.31–0.01 (96%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Koekkoek5:13

    xG 0.27–0.07 (80%)attempts 3–6goals 2–0

  3. Garrison – Nesterov3:37

    xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.9 xGPHI 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #175 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.24 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

TBL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).