Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 26, 2016·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Minnesota Wild 3, St. Louis Blues 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 59% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN1911117040331
STL01611228021438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:36MINMikko KoivuAssists: Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:41STLPaul StastnyAssists: David Perron · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:43MINErik HaulaAssists: Jason Pominville, Nino Niederreiter · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:27STLJaden SchwartzAssists: David Perron, Alex Pietrangelo · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:30STLJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Colton Parayko, Alex Pietrangelo · Backhand, 0.30 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:52MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Eric Staal, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. STL Robby Fabbri stopped
  2. 2. MIN Charlie Coyle stopped
  3. 3. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  4. 4. MIN Zach Parise stopped
  5. 5. STL Kevin Shattenkirk stopped
  6. 6. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  7. 7. STL David Perron scored
  8. 8. MIN Mikael Granlund stopped
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 12:06MINMarco Scandella: Cross checking2 min
  2. P2 1:28STLKevin Shattenkirk: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 3:31STLPaul Stastny: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 4:15MINMarco Scandella: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
44% to win56% to win
← MIN attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Berglund won the faceoff against Haula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINSTL
31Shots on goal38
3.2Expected goals3.7
60Shot attempts64
34Faceoffs won28
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
19Hits28
11Blocked shots17
2Giveaways3
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund13:26

    xG 0.37–0.52 (42%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  2. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter12:45

    xG 0.64–0.99 (39%)attempts 14–16goals 1–1

  3. Stewart – Graovac – Mitchell9:12

    xG 0.09–0.45 (16%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Parise – Coyle12:00

    xG 0.17–0.70 (20%)attempts 5–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Scandella – Prosser7:39

    xG 0.43–0.49 (47%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon21:56

    xG 0.50–1.05 (32%)attempts 14–22goals 1–1

  3. Brodin – Dumba17:22

    xG 0.31–1.13 (22%)attempts 13–19goals 1–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestStastny – Perron – Schwartz13:55

    xG 0.87–0.19 (82%)attempts 19–5goals 1–0

  2. Lehtera – Tarasenko – Fabbri11:51

    xG 0.58–0.35 (62%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  3. Upshall – Brodziak – Reaves7:31

    xG 0.33–0.15 (69%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Berglund – Tarasenko – Jaskin4:11

    xG 0.08–0.08 (50%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Parayko10:17

    xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. Shattenkirk – Bortuzzo5:35

    xG 0.43–0.09 (83%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo16:07

    xG 0.94–0.62 (60%)attempts 21–14goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.7 xGMIN 3.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #136 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.36 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 59% of the time.

STL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).