Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 1, 2016·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Tampa Bay Lightning 4, St. Louis Blues 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 57% of the time.

STL winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL1717212426
STL3141616526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:39STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:37STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Kevin Shattenkirk · Slap, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 10:39TBLCedric PaquetteAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Joel Vermin · Slap, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P1 13:17STLKevin ShattenkirkPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Robby Fabbri · Tip-in, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P2 1:44STLKevin ShattenkirkPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Vladimir Tarasenko · Slap, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P2 14:25TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 1:41TBLNikita KucherovPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Brian Boyle · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P3 8:11STLVladimir TarasenkoGWGAssists: Robby Fabbri, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–5
  9. P3 11:56TBLCedric PaquetteAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Joel Vermin · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 1:52TBLNikita Nesterov: Interference2 min
  2. P1 8:38TBLBraydon Coburn: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:45TBLOndrej Palat: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 1:17TBLBrayden Point: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  5. P2 9:27TBLTyler Johnson: Kneeing2 min
  6. P2 18:54TBLAndrej Sustr: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 1:34STLJay Bouwmeester: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 12:59TBLCedric Paquette: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 19:57STLPaul Stastny: Delaying game face off violation2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
44% to win56% to win
← TBL attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Johnson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLSTL
26Shots on goal26
2.1Expected goals2.4
50Shot attempts49
27Faceoffs won30
2Power plays7
14Penalty minutes4
30Hits12
9Blocked shots12
3Giveaways3
6Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestPaquette – Vermin – Drouin11:51

    xG 0.36–0.17 (68%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  2. Boyle – Bournival – Brown3:17

    xG 0.10–0.12 (45%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Filppula – Killorn – Point10:24

    xG 0.38–0.47 (45%)attempts 10–5goals 0–2

  4. Johnson – Palat – Kucherov11:59

    xG 0.23–0.41 (36%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Hedman11:09

    xG 0.50–0.18 (74%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Nesterov8:45

    xG 0.39–0.28 (59%)attempts 10–2goals 0–1

  3. Garrison – Sustr7:57

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestStastny – Perron – Schwartz13:51

    xG 0.45–0.32 (58%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Upshall – Brodziak – Reaves6:45

    xG 0.12–0.12 (50%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Berglund – Lehtera – Jaskin10:01

    xG 0.25–0.31 (44%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  4. Steen – Tarasenko – Fabbri9:50

    xG 0.55–0.76 (42%)attempts 11–15goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Parayko13:07

    xG 0.72–0.43 (63%)attempts 11–13goals 2–1

  2. Shattenkirk – Gunnarsson10:55

    xG 0.30–0.41 (42%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo16:42

    xG 0.49–0.82 (37%)attempts 12–16goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.4 xGTBL 2.1 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 81/100 · #198 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 57% of the time.

STL winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).