Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 4, 2016·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Minnesota Wild 2, Edmonton Oilers 1 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN1120110911233
EDM1130100402129

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:56EDMPatrick MaroonAssists: Mark Fayne, Zack Kassian · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:05MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–1
  3. OT 3:11MINMikko KoivuGWGAssists: Charlie Coyle, Mathew Dumba · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–1
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 8:44EDMZack Kassian: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 8:44MINChris Stewart: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 10:35MINJason Pominville: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 18:25MINKurtis Gabriel: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 18:25EDMZack Kassian: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 5:26EDMMilan Lucic: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 11:46MINJared Spurgeon: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 13:37MINNate Prosser: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 11:52EDMMark Letestu: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
44% to win56% to win
← MIN attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Haula won the faceoff against Caggiula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINEDM
33Shots on goal29
2.8Expected goals2.3
58Shot attempts62
37Faceoffs won24
2Power plays3
13Penalty minutes11
13Hits17
18Blocked shots13
7Giveaways9
5Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Coyle – Niederreiter5:48

    xG 0.87–0.10 (89%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund11:25

    xG 0.87–0.21 (81%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Parise – Haula7:14

    xG 0.05–0.05 (48%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter4:05

    xG 0.11–0.23 (31%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Prosser9:04

    xG 0.57–0.06 (90%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba10:31

    xG 0.69–0.25 (74%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon15:29

    xG 0.60–0.42 (59%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLetestu – Maroon – Kassian7:21

    xG 0.57–0.46 (55%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  2. Pitlick – Slepyshev – Caggiula8:10

    xG 0.20–0.22 (48%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Lucic – Draisaitl – McDavid12:16

    xG 0.41–0.82 (34%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  4. Pouliot – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins11:06

    xG 0.11–0.52 (18%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestFayne – Klefbom11:18

    xG 0.71–0.54 (57%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

  2. Sekera – Benning13:22

    xG 0.46–0.47 (50%)attempts 17–10goals 0–0

  3. Russell – Larsson16:41

    xG 0.36–1.13 (24%)attempts 14–22goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.3 xGMIN 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 37/100 · #739 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.27 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).