Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 6, 2016·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Edmonton Oilers 3, Buffalo Sabres 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 68% of the time.

BUF winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
EDM0521411800337
BUF210051912426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:38BUFEvander KanePPAssists: Jake McCabe, Matt Moulson · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:46BUFBrian GiontaAssists: Marcus Foligno, Rasmus Ristolainen · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:31EDMJordan EberlePPAssists: Drake Caggiula, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Backhand, 0.23 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:16EDMMilan LucicAssists: Connor McDavid, Drake Caggiula · Snap, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:59EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Andrej Sekera · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:31BUFEvander KaneAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:57BUFRasmus RistolainenPPGWGAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Jack Eichel · Slap, 0.05 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:03EDMZack Kassian: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:45EDMConnor McDavid: Interference2 min
  3. P2 8:34BUFJake McCabe: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 12:57BUFCody Franson: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 15:54BUFKyle Okposo: Interference2 min
  6. P3 3:43EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Interference2 min
  7. P3 8:26BUFEvander Kane: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 19:42EDMAdam Larsson: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← EDM attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMBUF
37Shots on goal26
3.1Expected goals2.0
62Shot attempts43
30Faceoffs won40
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
20Hits25
7Blocked shots13
2Giveaways2
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – McDavid – Caggiula6:31

    xG 0.56–0.23 (71%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Lucic – Draisaitl – McDavid5:29

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  3. Maroon – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins12:28

    xG 0.18–0.16 (53%)attempts 16–7goals 0–0

  4. Kassian – Puljujarvi – Caggiula3:53

    xG 0.01–0.04 (18%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSekera – Benning13:54

    xG 0.81–0.40 (67%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

  2. Klefbom – Benning6:52

    xG 0.36–0.10 (79%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Sekera – Russell2:08

    xG 0.08–0.02 (79%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKane – Reinhart – Eichel8:37

    xG 0.67–0.25 (73%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson9:26

    xG 0.20–0.08 (70%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Moulson – Grant – Girgensons3:02

    xG 0.04–0.05 (41%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Okposo – O'Reilly – Carrier9:25

    xG 0.17–0.20 (46%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFalk – Burgdoerfer11:08

    xG 0.58–0.10 (86%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen15:11

    xG 0.40–0.61 (39%)attempts 9–13goals 1–1

  3. Franson – Guhle13:14

    xG 0.10–0.32 (24%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.0 xGEDM 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #56 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.56 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 68% of the time.

BUF winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).