Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 7, 2016·Honda Center, Anaheim

Carolina Hurricanes 5, Anaheim Ducks 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 53% of the time.

ANA winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CAR11327212021534
ANA11317314042638

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:57ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Ryan Kesler · Backhand, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:22CARTeuvo TeravainenPPAssists: Jaccob Slavin, Justin Faulk · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:45CARJay McClementAssists: Jeff Skinner, Derek Ryan · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:10CARSebastian AhoAssists: Lee Stempniak, Cam Ward · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:52ANAStefan NoesenAssists: Ondrej Kase, Joseph Cramarossa · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:46CARBrett PesceAssists: Andrej Nestrasil · Slap, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P3 8:21ANARyan KeslerAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Jakob Silfverberg · Tip-in, 0.26 xG4–3
  8. P3 9:21CARTeuvo TeravainenAssists: Sebastian Aho, Lee Stempniak · Wrist, 0.18 xG5–3
  9. P3 16:01ANANick RitchieAssists: Cam Fowler, Corey Perry · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:32ANACorey PerryUnassisted · Slap, 0.18 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Jakob Silfverberg stopped
  2. 2. CAR Sebastian Aho scored
  3. 3. ANA Ryan Getzlaf scored
  4. 4. CAR Teuvo Teravainen stopped
  5. 5. ANA Corey Perry stopped
  6. 6. CAR Jaccob Slavin stopped
  7. 7. ANA Ondrej Kase scored
  8. 8. CAR Jeff Skinner stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 0:29ANANick Ritchie: Holding2 min
  2. P1 5:57CARJoakim Nordstrom: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 17:57ANASami Vatanen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:25ANARyan Garbutt: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 11:09ANAShea Theodore: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 16:27CARJeff Skinner: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P3 19:47CARVictor Rask: High sticking2 min
  8. OT 4:49ANAShea Theodore: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
44% to win56% to win
← CAR attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Teravainen won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARANA
34Shots on goal38
3.3Expected goals3.5
61Shot attempts69
26Faceoffs won36
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
14Hits27
20Blocked shots8
14Giveaways19
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStempniak – Teravainen – Aho12:50

    xG 0.71–0.09 (88%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  2. Nestrasil – McGinn – Ryan7:46

    xG 0.32–0.37 (47%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. McClement – Stalberg – Nordstrom10:58

    xG 0.26–0.84 (24%)attempts 8–16goals 0–2

  4. Skinner – Rask – Di Giuseppe10:53

    xG 0.28–1.05 (21%)attempts 8–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSlavin – Pesce16:11

    xG 0.96–0.51 (65%)attempts 16–12goals 3–1

  2. Tennyson – Hanifin11:07

    xG 0.51–0.31 (62%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

  3. Hainsey – Faulk14:22

    xG 0.29–1.33 (18%)attempts 10–22goals 0–3

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg13:52

    xG 1.20–0.25 (83%)attempts 19–7goals 2–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Ritchie9:20

    xG 0.65–0.17 (79%)attempts 10–6goals 2–1

  3. Garbutt – Shaw – Noesen5:32

    xG 0.12–0.06 (68%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  4. Vermette – Cramarossa – Kase11:40

    xG 0.31–0.69 (31%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVatanen – Fowler15:44

    xG 1.37–0.48 (74%)attempts 22–9goals 4–1

  2. Manson – Lindholm12:13

    xG 0.65–0.45 (59%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Lindholm2:25

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.5 xGCAR 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANACAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #13 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.90 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 53% of the time.

ANA winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).