Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 9, 2016·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Edmonton Oilers 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
EDM1110914032227
MIN06110111093336

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:04EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Benoit Pouliot, Tyler Pitlick · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:26MINMathew DumbaAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:19MINJason ZuckerAssists: Mikael Granlund · Snap, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 15:21EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsPPAssists: Oscar Klefbom, Jordan Eberle · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Jason Pominville scored
  2. 2. EDM Mark Letestu stopped
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  4. 4. EDM Matt Hendricks stopped
  5. 5. MIN Zach Parise stopped
  6. 6. EDM Leon Draisaitl scored
  7. 7. MIN Charlie Coyle stopped
  8. 8. EDM Connor McDavid stopped
  9. 9. MIN Chris Stewart scored
  10. 10. EDM Jordan Eberle scored
  11. 11. MIN Eric Staal scored
  12. 12. EDM Ryan Nugent-Hopkins stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:32EDMZack Kassian: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 12:23MINMarco Scandella: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 17:01EDMAdam Larsson: Interference2 min
  4. P3 2:00EDMKris Russell: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 11:49MINKurtis Gabriel: Interference2 min
  6. P3 15:11MINMathew Dumba: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. OT 1:09EDMConnor McDavid: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
44% to win56% to win
← EDM attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nugent-Hopkins won the faceoff against Haula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMMIN
27Shots on goal36
2.2Expected goals3.6
58Shot attempts66
28Faceoffs won35
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
14Hits12
15Blocked shots22
4Giveaways3
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestPouliot – Pitlick – Draisaitl10:32

    xG 0.87–0.12 (88%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Lucic – McDavid – Caggiula12:43

    xG 0.41–0.19 (69%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  3. Hendricks – Letestu – Kassian6:34

    xG 0.14–0.07 (68%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Maroon – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins10:26

    xG 0.20–0.32 (39%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSimpson – Benning6:50

    xG 0.46–0.02 (95%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Sekera – Russell15:45

    xG 0.53–0.26 (67%)attempts 13–15goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – Benning3:31

    xG 0.21–0.01 (93%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStewart – Graovac – Gabriel7:16

    xG 0.38–0.10 (79%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Parise – Coyle14:16

    xG 0.38–0.38 (50%)attempts 14–19goals 0–0

  3. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund12:50

    xG 0.22–0.50 (31%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  4. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter8:46

    xG 0.18–0.83 (18%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba13:58

    xG 0.58–0.25 (70%)attempts 11–10goals 2–0

  2. Scandella – Prosser14:35

    xG 0.52–0.48 (52%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon16:04

    xG 0.11–1.19 (8%)attempts 8–23goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.6 xGEDM 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #362 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

MIN winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).