Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 13, 2016·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Los Angeles Kings 3, Buffalo Sabres 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 59% of the time.

BUF winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK11316114333
BUF0104927626

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:00LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Trevor Lewis, Jake Muzzin · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:34LAKJeff CarterAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Derek Forbort · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:31BUFRyan O'ReillyAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:36BUFJack EichelAssists: Kyle Okposo, Matt Moulson · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:48BUFBrian GiontaAssists: Justin Falk, Johan Larsson · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P2 15:44BUFJack EichelGWGAssists: Kyle Okposo, Matt Moulson · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:03LAKJeff CarterUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–4
  8. P3 15:42BUFEvander KaneAssists: Jack Eichel, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:34BUFSam ReinhartENAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.60 xG3–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 5:27LAKJake Muzzin: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 5:27BUFRyan O'Reilly: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:11LAKTrevor Lewis: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 5:58BUFEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 5:58LAKAndy Andreoff: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 18:30BUFJustin Falk: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 18:30LAKTanner Pearson: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← LAK attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKBUF
33Shots on goal26
1.5Expected goals1.8
54Shot attempts42
28Faceoffs won28
0Power plays1
11Penalty minutes9
35Hits35
12Blocked shots13
6Giveaways5
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestGaborik – Kopitar – Lewis9:46

    xG 0.49–0.14 (78%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  2. Carter – Toffoli – Pearson2:39

    xG 0.06–0.03 (67%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Carter – King – Toffoli8:36

    xG 0.08–0.05 (60%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  4. Clifford – Nolan – Andreoff5:24

    xG 0.08–0.10 (45%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Martinez16:45

    xG 0.60–0.32 (65%)attempts 16–14goals 1–3

  2. Doughty – Gravel2:44

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Gravel10:58

    xG 0.19–0.11 (63%)attempts 13–5goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGionta – Foligno – Larsson11:45

    xG 0.25–0.07 (79%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

  2. Moulson – Okposo – Eichel5:54

    xG 0.22–0.12 (64%)attempts 7–7goals 2–0

  3. Okposo – Kane – Eichel5:15

    xG 0.18–0.15 (54%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

  4. Moulson – Deslauriers – Girgensons3:53

    xG 0.07–0.05 (58%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Kulikov18:23

    xG 0.38–0.32 (55%)attempts 10–19goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen18:09

    xG 0.43–0.45 (49%)attempts 16–15goals 3–2

  3. Franson – Falk11:27

    xG 0.12–0.16 (42%)attempts 1–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.8 xGLAK 1.5 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #186 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 17% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 59% of the time.

BUF winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).