Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 14, 2016·Pepsi Center, Denver

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Colorado Avalanche 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

COL winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI0122924425
COL05210114329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:01PHIMichael Del ZottoAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakub Voracek · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–0
  2. P2 12:14COLRene BourqueAssists: Carl Soderberg · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:34COLMatt DucheneAssists: Nikita Zadorov, Gabriel Landeskog · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–2
  4. P2 16:57PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Radko Gudas, Travis Konecny · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:30PHIRoman LyubimovUnassisted · Slap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:16PHIBrayden SchennGWGAssists: Andrew MacDonald, Taylor Leier · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:15COLMatt DucheneAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Mikhail Grigorenko · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 15:34COLNikita Zadorov: Interference2 min
  2. P1 19:42COLBlake Comeau: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 10:04PHIDale Weise: Holding2 min
  4. P2 12:54COLJohn Mitchell: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 13:20PHIBrayden Schenn: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 18:36COLGabriel Landeskog: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 18:36PHIJakub Voracek: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 18:36PHIJakub Voracek: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
44% to win56% to win
← PHI attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICOL
25Shots on goal29
1.8Expected goals1.8
46Shot attempts54
27Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
14Hits20
12Blocked shots10
5Giveaways9
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSimmonds – Schenn – Konecny10:16

    xG 0.24–0.09 (72%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  2. VandeVelde – Bellemare – Lyubimov8:57

    xG 0.19–0.11 (65%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  3. Weise – Cousins – Leier8:54

    xG 0.14–0.20 (42%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Raffl12:47

    xG 0.22–0.97 (18%)attempts 12–16goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Gudas16:10

    xG 0.74–0.34 (69%)attempts 13–12goals 3–1

  2. MacDonald – Provorov16:23

    xG 0.27–0.42 (39%)attempts 4–14goals 1–0

  3. Manning – Gostisbehere12:37

    xG 0.30–0.63 (32%)attempts 18–10goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestIginla – Mitchell – Comeau10:21

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Bourque – Landeskog – MacKinnon11:01

    xG 0.43–0.36 (55%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  3. Soderberg – McLeod – Martinsen4:57

    xG 0.07–0.08 (49%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Duchene – Grigorenko – Rantanen11:34

    xG 0.14–0.69 (17%)attempts 6–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarrie – Zadorov4:45

    xG 0.18–0.04 (84%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Beauchemin – Tyutin2:59

    xG 0.32–0.20 (61%)attempts 6–5goals 1–1

  3. Tyutin – Zadorov2:28

    xG 0.07–0.04 (62%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 1.8 xGPHI 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #234 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.05 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 18% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 53% of the time.

COL winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).