Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 15, 2016·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Florida Panthers 3, Winnipeg Jets 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 55% of the time.

WPG winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA01931706021344
WPG18111110032432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:49WPGDustin ByfuglienAssists: Patrik Laine, Mathieu Perreault · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:51FLAAleksander BarkovPPAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Jaromir Jagr · Slap, 0.46 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:36FLAReilly SmithPPAssists: Seth Griffith, Keith Yandle · Snap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:11WPGAdam LowryAssists: Paul Postma, Brandon Tanev · Wrist, 0.35 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:58FLAVincent TrocheckPPAssists: Aaron Ekblad, Reilly Smith · Wrist, 0.42 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:36WPGBryan LittleAssists: Blake Wheeler, Dustin Byfuglien · Snap, 0.11 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Vincent Trocheck scored
  2. 2. WPG Mark Scheifele stopped
  3. 3. FLA Aleksander Barkov stopped
  4. 4. WPG Patrik Laine stopped
  5. 5. FLA Seth Griffith stopped
  6. 6. WPG Bryan Little scored
  7. 7. FLA Nick Bjugstad stopped
  8. 8. WPG Blake Wheeler stopped
  9. 9. FLA Reilly Smith stopped
  10. 10. WPG Nikolaj Ehlers stopped
  11. 11. FLA Jussi Jokinen stopped
  12. 12. WPG Mathieu Perreault scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P2 0:31FLAJason Demers: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 3:20WPGToby Enstrom: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:37FLAAaron Ekblad: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 7:45WPGToby Enstrom: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 11:27WPGToby Enstrom: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 17:33FLAVincent Trocheck: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 17:33WPGJacob Trouba: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 2:01FLAMike Matheson: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 2:01WPGNikolaj Ehlers: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 13:05FLAColton Sceviour: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 13:05WPGPatrik Laine: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
44% to win56% to win
← FLA attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Scheifele won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAWPG
44Shots on goal32
4.8Expected goals4.5
69Shot attempts53
28Faceoffs won37
3Power plays2
10Penalty minutes12
9Hits14
9Blocked shots9
15Giveaways15
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestJagr – Griffith – Barkov11:59

    xG 1.15–0.14 (89%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Bjugstad – Malgin9:01

    xG 0.41–0.24 (63%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Sceviour – Smith – Trocheck13:49

    xG 1.08–0.96 (53%)attempts 22–15goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – MacKenzie – Thompson3:54

    xG 0.08–0.81 (9%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDemers – Matheson11:36

    xG 1.10–0.48 (69%)attempts 16–5goals 0–1

  2. Yandle – Pysyk2:44

    xG 0.40–0.21 (66%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  3. Yandle – Demers4:47

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestWheeler – Scheifele – Ehlers9:23

    xG 0.53–0.16 (77%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Stafford – Lowry – Dano3:20

    xG 0.30–0.12 (72%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Wheeler – Little – Perreault3:49

    xG 0.16–0.06 (75%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Scheifele – Ehlers – Laine5:01

    xG 0.09–0.12 (44%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPostma – Chiarot6:47

    xG 0.96–0.36 (73%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  2. Byfuglien – Morrissey16:29

    xG 0.55–0.65 (46%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Enstrom – Trouba20:35

    xG 0.83–1.86 (31%)attempts 13–33goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 4.5 xGFLA 4.8 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #321 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 55% of the time.

WPG winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).