Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 17, 2016·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Tampa Bay Lightning 2, Edmonton Oilers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

EDM winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TBL05113114011233
EDM01111317012332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 3:58EDMMilan LucicPPAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Andrej Sekera · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 18:59TBLJonathan DrouinPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Brayden Point · Snap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P3 2:35TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Cory Conacher, Nikita Nesterov · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P3 7:03EDMLeon DraisaitlPPAssists: Mark Letestu, Andrej Sekera · Deflected, 0.10 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. EDM Mark Letestu scored
  2. 2. TBL Brayden Point stopped
  3. 3. EDM Leon Draisaitl stopped
  4. 4. TBL Jonathan Drouin scored
  5. 5. EDM Connor McDavid scored
  6. 6. TBL Brian Boyle stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:04TBLCory Conacher: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 10:31TBLJT Brown: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 15:05EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 1:30EDMLeon Draisaitl: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 2:45TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 5:16TBLAlex Killorn: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 8:04EDMMatt Hendricks: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 17:31EDMTaylor Beck: Slashing2 min · PPG
  9. P3 6:56TBLSlater Koekkoek: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. OT 4:50TBLBrayden Point: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
44% to win56% to win
← TBL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLEDM
33Shots on goal32
3.4Expected goals2.1
64Shot attempts58
27Faceoffs won34
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
12Hits25
13Blocked shots16
12Giveaways12
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Namestnikov – Point11:44

    xG 0.68–0.16 (81%)attempts 20–6goals 0–0

  2. Condra – Johnson – Conacher5:08

    xG 0.26–0.14 (65%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Brown – Vermin2:58

    xG 0.13–0.04 (77%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Boyle – Drouin11:59

    xG 0.07–0.08 (46%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCoburn – Nesterov3:02

    xG 0.28–0.05 (86%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Garrison – Nesterov2:47

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – Hedman10:29

    xG 0.30–0.15 (66%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestHendricks – Letestu – Kassian7:52

    xG 0.44–0.16 (74%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Maroon – Nugent-Hopkins – Draisaitl4:34

    xG 0.08–0.09 (46%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Beck – Pitlick – Nugent-Hopkins4:34

    xG 0.06–0.20 (22%)attempts 2–5goals 0–1

  4. Lucic – Eberle – McDavid14:24

    xG 0.25–0.58 (30%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Davidson – Benning10:13

    xG 0.29–0.40 (42%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Klefbom15:41

    xG 0.27–0.43 (38%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – Russell13:57

    xG 0.18–0.64 (22%)attempts 10–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.1 xGTBL 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 59/100 · #469 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

EDM winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).