Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 22, 2016·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, Columbus Blue Jackets 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11006010126
CBJ16212410728

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:39PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Ian Cole, Conor Sheary · Snap, 0.38 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:01CBJCam AtkinsonPPAssists: Nick Foligno, Alexander Wennberg · Snap, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:15CBJWilliam KarlssonGWGAssists: Sam Gagner, Josh Anderson · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 12:20CBJScott HartnellUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P3 2:44CBJScott HartnellAssists: Sam Gagner, Jack Johnson · Slap, 0.24 xG1–4
  6. P3 3:01CBJBrandon SaadAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Nick Foligno · Snap, 0.01 xG1–5
  7. P3 3:35CBJBoone JennerAssists: Brandon Dubinsky, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–6
  8. P3 6:24CBJScott HartnellAssists: Brandon Dubinsky, Brandon Saad · Snap, 0.13 xG1–7
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:19PITIan Cole: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:44CBJScott Hartnell: Elbowing2 min
  3. P2 5:45PITSteve Oleksy: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 5:45CBJBoone Jenner: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 13:04CBJScott Hartnell: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P2 13:04PITSteve Oleksy: High sticking2 min
  7. P3 4:21PITSteve Oleksy: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 7:13PITConor Sheary: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 8:23CBJLukas Sedlak: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 11:51CBJLukas Sedlak: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 18:57CBJMatt Calvert: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 18:57PITCarl Hagelin: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
44% to win56% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
26Shots on goal28
3.8Expected goals3.4
49Shot attempts53
24Faceoffs won37
3Power plays4
17Penalty minutes15
12Hits15
14Blocked shots14
6Giveaways5
6Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Rust – Sheary10:21

    xG 0.99–0.68 (59%)attempts 10–13goals 1–2

  2. Kunitz – Malkin – Hornqvist11:21

    xG 0.17–0.34 (33%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Fehr – Wilson5:50

    xG 0.00–0.26 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

  4. Kessel – Bonino – Hagelin8:15

    xG 0.37–0.79 (32%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Schultz15:18

    xG 1.12–0.72 (61%)attempts 13–17goals 1–2

  2. Oleksy – Maatta5:43

    xG 0.20–0.03 (88%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Oleksy3:05

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Gagner – Sedlak6:03

    xG 0.74–0.01 (99%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Dubinsky – Calvert – Atkinson2:20

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Saad – Wennberg11:27

    xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  4. Calvert – Karlsson – Anderson8:30

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Nutivaara13:13

    xG 1.10–0.18 (86%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Johnson – Savard14:48

    xG 1.00–0.11 (90%)attempts 13–10goals 3–0

  3. Jones – Werenski14:00

    xG 0.12–1.26 (9%)attempts 7–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.4 xGPIT 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #869 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.84 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 40% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 56% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).