Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 31, 2016·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ1831007425
MIN0817116231

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:05CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Brandon Dubinsky · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:29CBJJack JohnsonAssists: Brandon Saad, Alexander Wennberg · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P2 3:44CBJCam AtkinsonGWGAssists: Ryan Murray, Markus Nutivaara · Tip-in, 0.16 xG3–0
  4. P2 5:58MINMikael GranlundPPAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–1
  5. P2 17:35CBJSeth JonesAssists: Brandon Saad, Nick Foligno · Snap, 0.09 xG4–1
  6. P3 0:24MINJason ZuckerAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jared Spurgeon · Backhand, 0.09 xG4–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 14:53MINMarco Scandella: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 17:58MINJason Zucker: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 17:58CBJMatt Calvert: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 18:52CBJSergei Bobrovsky: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 2:28CBJJosh Anderson: Fighting5 min · PPG
  6. P2 2:28MINChris Stewart: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 2:28CBJMatt Calvert: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 2:28MINMathew Dumba: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 2:28MINMathew Dumba: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P2 2:28CBJMatt Calvert: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P2 5:11CBJRyan Murray: Cross checking2 min
  12. P2 9:07MINMikael Granlund: Interference2 min
  13. P3 16:22CBJRyan Murray: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
44% to win56% to win
← CBJ attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Wennberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJMIN
25Shots on goal31
2.3Expected goals2.3
44Shot attempts53
30Faceoffs won36
2Power plays3
28Penalty minutes26
24Hits18
11Blocked shots8
2Giveaways8
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner11:01

    xG 0.31–0.09 (77%)attempts 9–6goals 2–0

  2. Hartnell – Gagner – Sedlak4:56

    xG 0.16–0.19 (46%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Hartnell – Karlsson – Anderson2:20

    xG 0.01–0.07 (15%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Calvert – Karlsson – Anderson4:18

    xG 0.07–0.27 (20%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Jones – Werenski14:39

    xG 0.28–0.28 (49%)attempts 17–11goals 1–1

  2. Murray – Nutivaara14:18

    xG 0.57–0.62 (48%)attempts 8–13goals 2–0

  3. Johnson – Savard16:05

    xG 0.37–0.50 (42%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStewart – Schroeder – Graovac4:10

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund11:48

    xG 0.36–0.15 (71%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  3. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter3:29

    xG 0.21–0.11 (65%)attempts 2–4goals 0–1

  4. Haula – Coyle – Niederreiter5:54

    xG 0.12–0.10 (56%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon14:55

    xG 0.88–0.08 (92%)attempts 21–5goals 1–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba4:55

    xG 0.19–0.16 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Brodin2:32

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.3 xGCBJ 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #663 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).