Fri, Jan 6, 2017·United Center, Chicago
Carolina Hurricanes 1, Chicago Blackhawks 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 53% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | 019 | 112 | 09 | 140 |
| CHI | 19 | 17 | 08 | 224 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 12:13CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Marian Hossa, Vinnie Hinostroza · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
- P2 13:29CHIArtemi PanarinPPGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
- P2 19:55CARVictor RaskAssists: Ty Rattie, Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
Penalties (6)
- P1 8:31CHINiklas Hjalmarsson: Holding2 min
- P1 13:51CHIArtem Anisimov: Hooking2 min
- P2 2:48CARJay McClement: Boarding2 min
- P2 10:55CHIArtem Anisimov: Hooking2 min
- P2 13:12CARDerek Ryan: Holding2 min · PPG
- P3 19:58CARJaccob Slavin: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Toews
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestStempniak – Teravainen – Aho10:57
xG 0.25–0.18 (57%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0
- McClement – Stalberg – Nordstrom6:28
xG 0.15–0.15 (50%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0
- Staal – McGinn – Ryan12:44
xG 0.58–0.59 (50%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0
- Skinner – Rattie – Rask11:54
xG 0.57–0.61 (48%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestFaulk – Slavin3:18
xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0
- Pesce – Hanifin2:51
xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Faulk – Hanifin3:07
xG 0.44–0.38 (54%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestPanik – Hartman – Kero11:10
xG 0.44–0.05 (90%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0
- Anisimov – Kane – Panarin14:38
xG 0.34–0.25 (57%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0
- Hossa – Toews – Hinostroza13:25
xG 0.70–0.81 (46%)attempts 11–21goals 1–1
- Tootoo – Desjardins – Rasmussen4:01
xG 0.23–0.38 (38%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestSeabrook – Kempny11:01
xG 0.53–0.24 (69%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0
- Keith – Hjalmarsson17:24
xG 0.62–0.44 (58%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0
- Campbell – van Riemsdyk17:31
xG 0.78–0.80 (49%)attempts 12–24goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 53% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (CHI − CAR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).