Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 14, 2017·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Minnesota Wild 5, Dallas Stars 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 57% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN41201416532
DAL112212114438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:19MINMikko KoivuUnassisted · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:00MINEric StaalAssists: Charlie Coyle, Christian Folin · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–0
  3. P1 4:00MINMathew DumbaAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–0
  4. P1 12:45MINChris StewartAssists: Jordan Schroeder, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–0
  5. P1 19:53DALAntoine RousselAssists: Radek Faksa, Brett Ritchie · Snap, 0.15 xG4–1
  6. P2 2:20DALJiri HudlerAssists: Devin Shore, John Klingberg · Snap, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P2 6:06DALTyler SeguinAssists: Jamie Benn, John Klingberg · Backhand, 0.19 xG4–3
  8. P3 11:13DALJohn KlingbergPPAssists: Tyler Seguin, Jason Spezza · Slap, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P3 13:15MINJason ZuckerGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund · Tip-in, 0.31 xG5–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 16:50MINJonas Brodin: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 11:23DALJamie Benn: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 14:35DALJohn Klingberg: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 17:38MINJason Zucker: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 4:03DALPatrick Eaves: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 5:22DALDevin Shore: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 10:21MINEric Staal: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
44% to win56% to win
← MIN attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDAL
32Shots on goal38
3.0Expected goals3.4
59Shot attempts70
28Faceoffs won26
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
10Hits20
17Blocked shots18
10Giveaways10
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Zucker – Granlund11:05

    xG 0.85–0.44 (66%)attempts 15–7goals 3–1

  2. Stewart – Schroeder – Graovac6:17

    xG 0.54–0.57 (48%)attempts 8–9goals 1–2

  3. Staal – Parise – Coyle11:30

    xG 0.14–0.31 (32%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  4. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter10:21

    xG 0.12–0.42 (22%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon17:30

    xG 0.78–0.40 (66%)attempts 15–20goals 2–1

  2. Brodin – Folin10:38

    xG 0.52–0.46 (53%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  3. Scandella – Dumba13:39

    xG 0.59–1.01 (37%)attempts 11–16goals 3–1

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestEaves – Benn – Seguin7:59

    xG 0.47–0.15 (76%)attempts 12–5goals 1–0

  2. Sharp – Korpikoski – Faksa8:18

    xG 0.35–0.25 (58%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  3. Hudler – Ritchie – Shore4:05

    xG 0.01–0.07 (15%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Roussel – Eakin – Ritchie6:16

    xG 0.05–0.15 (25%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlingberg – Lindell16:39

    xG 0.82–0.21 (80%)attempts 20–9goals 1–1

  2. Hamhuis – Klingberg2:32

    xG 0.39–0.09 (81%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  3. Hamhuis – Benn10:45

    xG 0.36–0.59 (38%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 3.4 xGMIN 3.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #42 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.07 · 8 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 57% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).