Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 18, 2017·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Florida Panthers 3, Edmonton Oilers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
FLA1151111302331
EDM2130611111431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:10EDMZack KassianAssists: Connor McDavid · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:04EDMMark LetestuPPAssists: Connor McDavid, Andrej Sekera · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:13FLAVincent TrocheckAssists: Reilly Smith, Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:35FLAMichael SgarbossaPPAssists: Jonathan Marchessault, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.45 xG2–2
  5. P3 14:45FLAGreg McKeggAssists: Jaromir Jagr, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:01EDMJordan EberleAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:57EDMConnor McDavidGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 12:57FLAJonathan Marchessault: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  2. P2 11:50FLAJonathan Marchessault: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P2 15:17EDMEric Gryba: Holding2 min
  4. P2 17:22EDMBenoit Pouliot: Holding the stick2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
44% to win56% to win
← FLA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sgarbossa won the faceoff against Caggiula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAEDM
31Shots on goal31
1.9Expected goals2.2
59Shot attempts55
34Faceoffs won34
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
25Hits18
15Blocked shots20
16Giveaways23
12Takeaways15

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Smith – Marchessault3:54

    xG 0.13–0.07 (64%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Jagr – Trocheck – McCann3:46

    xG 0.06–0.13 (30%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. MacKenzie – Sceviour – Sgarbossa12:51

    xG 0.18–0.27 (40%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

  4. Thornton – McKegg – Thompson5:36

    xG 0.01–0.12 (11%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPysyk – Ekblad14:16

    xG 0.21–0.16 (57%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Yandle – Pysyk2:36

    xG 0.09–0.05 (65%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Yandle – Ekblad3:56

    xG 0.19–0.19 (50%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Draisaitl – McDavid17:30

    xG 0.65–0.32 (67%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

  2. Lucic – Letestu – Kassian2:04

    xG 0.18–0.00 (98%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Letestu – Kassian – Khaira2:32

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Pouliot – Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins14:43

    xG 0.35–0.32 (52%)attempts 18–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Klefbom19:23

    xG 0.82–0.25 (77%)attempts 22–9goals 2–0

  2. Sekera – Russell17:04

    xG 0.51–0.31 (62%)attempts 19–21goals 0–1

  3. Russell – Klefbom2:11

    xG 0.02–0.11 (12%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.2 xGFLA 1.9 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #116 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.22 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 57% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).