Fri, Jan 20, 2017·TD Garden, Boston
Chicago Blackhawks 1, Boston Bruins 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 82% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 06 | 08 | 18 | 122 |
| BOS | 017 | 08 | 05 | 030 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P3 18:34CHIMarian HossaGWGAssists: Tanner Kero, Vinnie Hinostroza · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
Penalties (5)
- P2 4:45CHIDuncan Keith: Slashing2 min
- P2 15:09BOSDominic Moore: Slashing2 min
- P2 19:36BOSDavid Krejci: Hooking2 min
- P2 0:00CHIJonathan Toews: Hooking2 min
- P3 7:14BOSRyan Spooner: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Anisimov
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestToews – Kane – Panarin2:20
xG 0.14–0.03 (81%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0
- Anisimov – Kane – Panarin13:19
xG 0.21–0.18 (54%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0
- Tootoo – Rasmussen – Schmaltz5:34
xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Hossa – Hinostroza – Kero9:58
xG 0.12–0.21 (37%)attempts 4–14goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- Seabrook – Kempny14:14
xG 0.37–0.53 (41%)attempts 16–14goals 1–0
- Campbell – van Riemsdyk12:37
xG 0.07–0.36 (16%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0
- Keith – Hjalmarsson18:23
xG 0.18–0.84 (18%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestKrejci – Schaller – Pastrnak11:51
xG 1.26–0.16 (89%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0
- Backes – Nash – Spooner9:01
xG 0.38–0.02 (96%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0
- Bergeron – Marchand – Vatrano11:11
xG 0.18–0.21 (46%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0
- Moore – Beleskey – Czarnik8:23
xG 0.03–0.09 (26%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Carlo15:12
xG 1.29–0.29 (82%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0
- Liles – Morrow11:39
xG 0.37–0.02 (94%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0
- Krug – Carlo2:15
xG 0.02–0.01 (64%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 82% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).