Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 22, 2017·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Boston Bruins 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS012122011145
PIT012212312536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:18PITBryan RustAssists: Sidney Crosby, Conor Sheary · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:06PITConor ShearyGWGAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 13:49BOSDavid KrejciAssists: David Pastrnak, Matt Beleskey · Slap, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:40PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Chad Ruhwedel, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P3 2:59PITConor ShearyAssists: Bryan Rust, Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–4
  6. P3 4:37PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.31 xG1–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 9:35PITJake Guentzel: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 17:22PITCameron Gaunce: Tripping2 min
  3. P3 4:31BOSMatt Beleskey: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 4:50PITCarl Hagelin: Holding2 min
  5. P3 8:04PITEvgeni Malkin: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 8:04PITCameron Gaunce: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 8:04BOSJoe Morrow: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P3 19:22BOSMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 19:22PITScott Wilson: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
44% to win56% to win
← BOS attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSPIT
45Shots on goal36
3.8Expected goals2.8
87Shot attempts48
33Faceoffs won30
4Power plays1
9Penalty minutes15
30Hits33
7Blocked shots27
4Giveaways2
2Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Vatrano12:34

    xG 0.65–0.29 (69%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

  2. Backes – Nash – Schaller7:20

    xG 0.53–0.22 (70%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  3. Moore – Spooner – Czarnik2:46

    xG 0.03–0.04 (41%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Krejci – Schaller – Pastrnak2:00

    xG 0.04–0.08 (36%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcQuaid – Krug15:13

    xG 0.75–0.60 (55%)attempts 22–12goals 0–2

  2. Chara – Carlo17:22

    xG 0.51–0.40 (56%)attempts 21–9goals 0–2

  3. Liles – Morrow14:00

    xG 0.27–1.25 (18%)attempts 14–20goals 1–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Fehr – Wilson7:49

    xG 0.63–0.11 (85%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Sheary12:18

    xG 0.71–0.35 (67%)attempts 11–14goals 3–0

  3. Malkin – Hornqvist – Guentzel12:47

    xG 0.74–0.45 (62%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  4. Kessel – Bonino – Hagelin9:54

    xG 0.26–0.49 (35%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMaatta – Ruhwedel12:33

    xG 0.93–0.28 (77%)attempts 16–16goals 2–1

  2. Cole – Schultz16:32

    xG 0.73–0.24 (75%)attempts 13–15goals 2–0

  3. Daley – Maatta2:33

    xG 0.02–0.14 (12%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.8 xGBOS 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #894 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).