Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 26, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Nashville Predators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ11408211333
NSH0921528432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:25CBJBrandon SaadAssists: Seth Jones, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:41NSHCalle JarnkrokPPAssists: Colin Wilson, Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:01NSHHarry ZolnierczykAssists: Colton Sissons, Cody McLeod · Backhand, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P3 6:03NSHCraig SmithAssists: Mattias Ekholm, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.39 xG1–3
  5. P3 9:12CBJZach WerenskiAssists: Brandon Dubinsky, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:18NSHCraig SmithGWGAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:09CBJRyan MurrayAssists: Zach Werenski, William Karlsson · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 6:03CBJScott Hartnell: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 3:49CBJMatt Calvert: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 11:38NSHAnthony Bitetto: Holding2 min
  4. P2 16:55CBJRyan Murray: Interference2 min
  5. P3 8:08CBJScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 8:08NSHMatt Irwin: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 14:48NSHMatt Irwin: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
44% to win56% to win
← CBJ attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJNSH
33Shots on goal32
2.4Expected goals2.5
53Shot attempts59
29Faceoffs won42
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
14Hits23
15Blocked shots11
8Giveaways13
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Gagner – Sedlak8:29

    xG 0.67–0.29 (69%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Dubinsky – Calvert – Atkinson11:36

    xG 0.26–0.30 (46%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

  3. Foligno – Saad – Wennberg12:32

    xG 0.41–0.70 (37%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  4. Jenner – Karlsson – Anderson7:50

    xG 0.21–0.60 (25%)attempts 6–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Savard12:01

    xG 0.67–0.33 (67%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Werenski15:14

    xG 0.69–0.38 (64%)attempts 18–9goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Murray4:22

    xG 0.07–0.15 (32%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson11:45

    xG 0.64–0.20 (76%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

  2. McLeod – Zolnierczyk – Sissons5:55

    xG 0.38–0.15 (72%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0

  3. Neal – Wilson – Jarnkrok10:43

    xG 0.25–0.23 (53%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  4. Fisher – Smith – Watson10:05

    xG 0.55–0.53 (51%)attempts 10–10goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm18:19

    xG 0.95–0.36 (73%)attempts 24–9goals 2–0

  2. Weber – Bitetto8:16

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Ellis – Irwin15:07

    xG 0.54–0.79 (41%)attempts 9–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.5 xGCBJ 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 53/100 · #524 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.21 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 53% of the time.

NSH winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).