Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 4, 2017·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Anaheim Ducks 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 84% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
ANA190413002216
TBL17115010053337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:14ANABrandon MontourAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Ryan Kesler · Slap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:48TBLJonathan DrouinAssists: Tyler Johnson, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:56TBLAlex KillornPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P3 4:02ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Ryan Kesler · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. TBL Brayden Point scored
  2. 2. ANA Jakob Silfverberg scored
  3. 3. TBL Jonathan Drouin stopped
  4. 4. ANA Ryan Getzlaf scored
  5. 5. TBL Nikita Kucherov scored
  6. 6. ANA Rickard Rakell stopped
  7. 7. TBL Brian Boyle scored
  8. 8. ANA Corey Perry stopped
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 2:08TBLGabriel Dumont: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 7:33ANAShea Theodore: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 7:36TBLJonathan Drouin: Interference2 min
  4. P1 10:52TBLJT Brown: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 10:52ANAJoseph Cramarossa: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 12:24TBLTyler Johnson: Interference2 min
  7. P1 18:00TBLBraydon Coburn: Slashing2 min
  8. P1 18:00ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  9. P1 18:47ANARyan Kesler: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 9:24ANABrandon Montour: Hooking2 min · PPG
  11. P2 11:16TBLCedric Paquette: Tripping2 min
  12. P2 13:12ANAAntoine Vermette: Interference2 min
  13. P2 16:33ANAShea Theodore: High sticking2 min
  14. P2 16:33ANAShea Theodore: High sticking2 min
  15. P2 18:11TBLNikita Kucherov: Cross checking2 min
  16. P3 10:19ANANate Thompson: Elbowing2 min
  17. P3 11:19TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
44% to win56% to win
← ANA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATBL
16Shots on goal37
1.4Expected goals3.4
39Shot attempts82
31Faceoffs won36
5Power plays7
21Penalty minutes19
25Hits25
21Blocked shots12
9Giveaways8
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Getzlaf – Perry – Rakell10:39

    xG 0.20–0.16 (55%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg8:52

    xG 0.00–0.12 (1%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Vermette – Ritchie – Kase7:31

    xG 0.09–0.21 (31%)attempts 3–13goals 0–0

  4. Thompson – Cramarossa – Shaw4:28

    xG 0.00–0.56 (0%)attempts 0–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Manson – Lindholm3:15

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. Manson – Theodore7:01

    xG 0.09–0.15 (39%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Montour3:01

    xG 0.04–0.17 (19%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestDumont – Brown – Paquette4:38

    xG 0.59–0.00 (100%)attempts 18–0goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Kucherov – Namestnikov10:17

    xG 0.17–0.05 (76%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Filppula – Boyle – Vermin5:39

    xG 0.14–0.03 (81%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Boyle – Drouin2:35

    xG 0.03–0.02 (58%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Dotchin10:20

    xG 0.78–0.02 (98%)attempts 19–2goals 1–0

  2. Coburn – Sustr10:02

    xG 0.28–0.04 (88%)attempts 15–4goals 0–1

  3. Stralman – Garrison12:03

    xG 0.20–0.21 (49%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.4 xGANA 1.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 61/100 · #431 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.83 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 41% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 84% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).