Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 7, 2017·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

San Jose Sharks 4, Buffalo Sabres 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 57% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS2171141900440
BUF1100831711536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:24BUFMatt MoulsonPPAssists: Brian Gionta, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.25 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:03SJSJoel WardAssists: Brent Burns, Paul Martin · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:13SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Backhand, 0.21 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:23SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Marcus Sorensen, Micheal Haley · Slap, 0.17 xG3–1
  5. P3 6:07SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Brent Burns, Patrick Marleau · Slap, 0.07 xG4–1
  6. P3 9:03BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Jack Eichel, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–2
  7. P3 11:36BUFEvander KaneAssists: Cody Franson, Brian Gionta · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:31BUFKyle OkposoAssists: Sam Reinhart, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:05BUFEvander KaneGWGAssists: Jack Eichel · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 5:44SJSJoe Thornton: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:32BUFDmitry Kulikov: Holding2 min
  3. P2 14:53BUFTaylor Fedun: Holding2 min
  4. P3 4:42BUFJustin Bailey: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 8:21SJSBrent Burns: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 9:03SJSMelker Karlsson: Throwing equipment2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← SJS attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Pavelski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSBUF
40Shots on goal36
3.6Expected goals3.1
73Shot attempts63
33Faceoffs won22
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
11Hits12
13Blocked shots18
7Giveaways4
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Hertl12:34

    xG 1.25–0.24 (84%)attempts 21–6goals 0–1

  2. Ward – Tierney – Meier9:42

    xG 0.24–0.09 (73%)attempts 11–6goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Couture – Boedker9:28

    xG 0.32–0.27 (55%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  4. Haley – Sorensen – Karlsson6:37

    xG 0.37–0.44 (46%)attempts 7–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun16:37

    xG 1.26–0.58 (69%)attempts 17–20goals 2–1

  2. Schlemko – Dillon10:15

    xG 0.72–0.12 (86%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  3. Martin – Burns14:58

    xG 0.72–0.48 (60%)attempts 19–10goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestEnnis – Kane – Eichel3:43

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Reinhart – Eichel8:30

    xG 0.32–0.45 (41%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  3. Okposo – O'Reilly – Foligno9:49

    xG 0.13–0.37 (26%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

  4. Gionta – Girgensons – Bailey9:42

    xG 0.21–0.83 (20%)attempts 8–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Gorges – Ristolainen2:35

    xG 0.05–0.02 (71%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Ristolainen16:19

    xG 0.66–0.64 (51%)attempts 16–17goals 0–2

  3. Franson – Kulikov2:33

    xG 0.17–0.17 (50%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.1 xGSJS 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #40 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.03 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 57% of the time.

BUF winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).