Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 12, 2017·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Detroit Red Wings 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET05214115334
MIN2121939630

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:01MINMikael GranlundPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Gustav Olofsson · Backhand, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:47MINNino NiederreiterPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Nate Prosser · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:56DETAnthony ManthaAssists: Xavier Ouellet, Gustav Nyquist · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:14MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Jason Pominville, Gustav Olofsson · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:39DETHenrik ZetterbergAssists: Xavier Ouellet, Anthony Mantha · Wrist, 0.37 xG2–3
  6. P3 3:59MINZach PariseGWGAssists: Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:34DETAndreas AthanasiouAssists: Nick Jensen, Niklas Kronwall · Wrist, 0.26 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:20MINChristian FolinAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–5
  9. P3 10:50MINZach ParisePPAssists: Eric Staal, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–6
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 11:07DETMike Green: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 14:13MINChris Stewart: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:13DETGustav Nyquist: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 14:13DETGustav Nyquist: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 19:35DETDanny DeKeyser: Holding2 min
  6. P3 10:06DETXavier Ouellet: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 14:53MINNino Niederreiter: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
44% to win56% to win
← DET attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Zetterberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETMIN
34Shots on goal30
2.7Expected goals3.8
61Shot attempts48
32Faceoffs won22
1Power plays4
10Penalty minutes4
18Hits14
10Blocked shots13
2Giveaways4
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestZetterberg – Nyquist – Mantha14:29

    xG 1.42–0.35 (80%)attempts 22–6goals 2–0

  2. Nielsen – Tatar – Larkin4:15

    xG 0.05–0.03 (67%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Nielsen – Tatar – Athanasiou4:38

    xG 0.36–0.33 (52%)attempts 7–6goals 1–2

  4. Tatar – Sheahan – Larkin2:40

    xG 0.05–0.09 (35%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKronwall – Smith4:41

    xG 0.63–0.14 (82%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Smith – Ouellet12:15

    xG 0.84–0.67 (56%)attempts 17–12goals 2–0

  3. Kronwall – Jensen7:06

    xG 0.51–0.43 (54%)attempts 11–6goals 1–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Parise – Coyle6:56

    xG 0.72–0.51 (58%)attempts 8–11goals 3–2

  2. Pominville – Parise – Haula2:33

    xG 0.12–0.09 (57%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Coyle – Niederreiter3:44

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Haula – Niederreiter8:06

    xG 0.20–0.22 (48%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon17:08

    xG 0.80–0.66 (55%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  2. Scandella – Folin13:40

    xG 0.38–0.62 (38%)attempts 10–11goals 2–1

  3. Prosser – Olofsson14:19

    xG 0.57–0.87 (39%)attempts 9–21goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.8 xGDET 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #281 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 68% of the time.

MIN winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).