Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Feb 15, 2017·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Florida Panthers 6, San Jose Sharks 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
FLA360321112622
SJS21011421101536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:20FLAJussi JokinenAssists: Reilly Smith, Vincent Trocheck · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:51SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:35FLANick BjugstadAssists: Aaron Ekblad, Mark Pysyk · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P1 7:12FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Keith Yandle, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P1 15:25SJSJoel WardAssists: Joe Thornton, Brent Burns · Deflected, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 6:27SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicAssists: Kevin Labanc, Joe Pavelski · Slap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 2:15FLANick BjugstadAssists: Alexander Petrovic · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–3
  8. P3 12:41FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Jaromir Jagr, Alexander Petrovic · Slap, 0.17 xG5–3
  9. P3 16:39SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: David Schlemko, Brenden Dillon · Backhand, 0.09 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:22SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Tomas Hertl, David Schlemko · Wrist, 0.32 xG5–5
  11. OT 1:38FLAJonathan HuberdeauGWGAssists: Aleksander Barkov · Wrist, 0.28 xG6–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 8:15SJSTimo Meier: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P2 9:29FLAJason Demers: Penalty shot holding on breakaway0 min
  3. P2 11:02FLADerek MacKenzie: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 17:39FLAJonathan Marchessault: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 2:37SJSMicheal Haley: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 7:35FLAJaromir Jagr: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
44% to win56% to win
← FLA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Couture
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLASJS
22Shots on goal36
2.2Expected goals3.3
49Shot attempts67
27Faceoffs won35
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
23Hits10
17Blocked shots15
21Giveaways28
12Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Sgarbossa – Marchessault9:33

    xG 0.48–0.26 (65%)attempts 8–7goals 2–1

  2. Jagr – Huberdeau – Barkov11:58

    xG 0.60–0.59 (51%)attempts 12–13goals 2–0

  3. Thornton – MacKenzie – Sceviour4:38

    xG 0.04–0.28 (12%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  4. Jokinen – Smith – Trocheck12:17

    xG 0.35–0.60 (37%)attempts 10–14goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetrovic – Matheson15:04

    xG 0.64–0.37 (63%)attempts 15–15goals 3–1

  2. Yandle – Demers14:19

    xG 0.39–0.64 (38%)attempts 10–15goals 1–1

  3. Pysyk – Ekblad16:26

    xG 0.41–0.70 (37%)attempts 10–17goals 1–2

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestMarleau – Couture – Boedker10:38

    xG 0.69–0.28 (71%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  2. Haley – Tierney – Karlsson7:53

    xG 0.24–0.00 (100%)attempts 11–0goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Labanc12:05

    xG 0.53–0.37 (59%)attempts 15–13goals 2–1

  4. Ward – Hertl – Meier7:52

    xG 0.15–0.45 (25%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchlemko – Dillon12:45

    xG 0.44–0.29 (60%)attempts 14–8goals 0–1

  2. Martin – Burns16:35

    xG 0.69–0.56 (55%)attempts 20–17goals 2–1

  3. Vlasic – Braun12:40

    xG 0.50–0.53 (48%)attempts 12–9goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.3 xGFLA 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #12 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.94 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 70% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).