Thu, Feb 16, 2017·Scottrade Center, St. Louis
Vancouver Canucks 3, St. Louis Blues 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 52% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 111 | 16 | 14 | 321 |
| STL | 28 | 06 | 27 | 421 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 4:30STLMagnus PaajarviAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Ivan Barbashev · Wrist, 0.38 xG0–1
- P1 10:15VANBo HorvatAssists: Nikita Tryamkin · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
- P1 17:17STLJori LehteraAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
- P2 8:27VANHenrik SedinAssists: Daniel Sedin, Markus Granlund · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
- P3 0:58STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
- P3 5:00STLAlexander SteenPPGWGAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–4
- P3 6:49VANBrandon SutterAssists: Alexander Edler, Troy Stecher · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–4
Penalties (5)
- P1 19:29VANJack Skille: Hooking2 min
- P2 12:56STLPatrik Berglund: Hooking2 min
- P2 19:05VANAlexandre Burrows: High sticking2 min · PPG
- P3 2:14VANHenrik Sedin: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
- P3 8:33STLJoel Edmundson: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Berglund won the faceoff against Horvat
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestSedin – Sedin – Granlund11:53
xG 0.36–0.16 (69%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0
- Burrows – Hansen – Horvat11:25
xG 0.29–0.13 (69%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0
- Skille – Chaput – Boucher4:38
xG 0.11–0.26 (29%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0
- Eriksson – Sutter – Megna10:27
xG 0.56–0.80 (41%)attempts 14–10goals 1–2
Defence pairs
- bestEdler – Stecher13:34
xG 0.64–0.32 (67%)attempts 17–6goals 2–1
- Tanev – Hutton2:06
xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Sbisa – Tanev12:05
xG 0.11–0.20 (37%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0
St. Louis Blues
Forward lines
- bestPaajarvi – Agostino – Barbashev7:13
xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0
- Berglund – Perron – Schwartz12:14
xG 0.37–0.22 (63%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1
- Steen – Lehtera – Tarasenko12:43
xG 0.39–0.37 (51%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1
- Reaves – Megan – Yakupov4:09
xG 0.14–0.13 (52%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestShattenkirk – Bortuzzo12:25
xG 0.74–0.23 (76%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0
- Edmundson – Parayko13:16
xG 0.49–0.66 (42%)attempts 10–12goals 1–1
- Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo18:03
xG 0.31–0.50 (38%)attempts 11–16goals 0–2
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 52% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (STL − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).