Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 16, 2017·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Dallas Stars 1, Minnesota Wild 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL01301319135
MIN1916111326

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:59MINRyan SuterPPAssists: Jason Pominville, Mikko Koivu · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:51MINErik HaulaGWGAssists: Jordan Schroeder, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P3 5:19DALCody EakinAssists: Antoine Roussel, Patrick Eaves · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P3 13:04MINJared SpurgeonAssists: Erik Haula, Mikael Granlund · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 19:20DALCurtis McKenzie: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:39MINMikko Koivu: Holding2 min
  3. P3 11:35MINChristian Folin: Roughing2 min
  4. P3 11:35DALAntoine Roussel: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P3 14:16DALJamie Benn: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 14:16MINCharlie Coyle: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P3 18:17MINNino Niederreiter: Interference5 min
  8. P3 18:17MINErik Haula: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 18:17MINNino Niederreiter: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P3 18:17DALRadek Faksa: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
44% to win56% to win
← DAL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALMIN
35Shots on goal26
2.3Expected goals2.3
80Shot attempts47
36Faceoffs won33
2Power plays1
16Penalty minutes31
9Hits15
11Blocked shots26
5Giveaways14
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestEaves – Benn – Seguin5:31

    xG 0.96–0.14 (87%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Roussel – Eakin – Ritchie4:37

    xG 0.25–0.07 (78%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – Benn – Seguin2:47

    xG 0.16–0.03 (84%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Roussel – Faksa5:39

    xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNemeth – Oleksiak14:16

    xG 0.43–0.03 (93%)attempts 23–4goals 0–0

  2. Klingberg – Lindell18:39

    xG 0.53–0.49 (52%)attempts 25–12goals 0–0

  3. Hamhuis – Benn14:03

    xG 1.00–1.27 (44%)attempts 18–19goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestParise – Coyle – Tuch9:45

    xG 0.92–0.28 (77%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  2. Stewart – Schroeder – Haula8:19

    xG 0.26–0.15 (63%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Staal – Niederreiter10:59

    xG 0.20–0.31 (39%)attempts 10–12goals 0–1

  4. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund14:06

    xG 0.42–1.34 (24%)attempts 9–26goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProsser – Olofsson11:53

    xG 0.86–0.30 (74%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Folin14:43

    xG 0.45–0.44 (50%)attempts 10–25goals 0–1

  3. Suter – Spurgeon20:41

    xG 0.59–1.34 (30%)attempts 15–28goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.3 xGDAL 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 16/100 · #1021 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).