Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 18, 2017·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Nashville Predators 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH010011218239
MIN19113311533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:38MINMikael GranlundPPAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.43 xG0–1
  2. P2 17:00MINJason ZuckerAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P3 0:35MINMikko KoivuGWGAssists: Ryan Suter, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.20 xG0–3
  4. P3 8:16NSHColin WilsonAssists: Yannick Weber · Wrist, 0.35 xG1–3
  5. P3 10:25NSHJames NealAssists: P.K. Subban, Colin Wilson · Deflected, 0.12 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:41MINJason ZuckerUnassisted · Backhand, 0.16 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:05MINEric StaalENAssists: Jason Pominville, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.56 xG2–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:09NSHHarry Zolnierczyk: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:55NSHP.K. Subban: Holding2 min
  3. P1 7:42NSHColin Wilson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 17:43NSHAustin Watson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 17:43MINChris Stewart: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P1 19:48NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  7. P1 19:48MINChris Stewart: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 9:33NSHJames Neal: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 12:00MINZach Parise: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 19:17MINChris Stewart: Interference2 min
  11. P3 19:17NSHVernon Fiddler: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 19:17MINChris Stewart: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
44% to win56% to win
← NSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Fisher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHMIN
39Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals3.3
68Shot attempts57
34Faceoffs won35
2Power plays4
25Penalty minutes21
27Hits13
15Blocked shots16
4Giveaways2
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeal – Wilson – Jarnkrok11:19

    xG 0.74–0.08 (90%)attempts 21–3goals 2–0

  2. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson9:56

    xG 0.30–0.41 (42%)attempts 15–5goals 0–3

  3. Fiddler – Zolnierczyk – Sissons7:49

    xG 0.19–0.33 (37%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  4. Fisher – Smith – Watson9:53

    xG 0.10–0.32 (24%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi12:12

    xG 0.83–0.07 (92%)attempts 27–3goals 1–0

  2. Josi – Ellis2:37

    xG 0.02–0.02 (54%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Subban – Ekholm14:24

    xG 0.37–0.37 (49%)attempts 15–7goals 1–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Zucker – Granlund11:44

    xG 0.45–0.37 (55%)attempts 7–16goals 3–0

  2. Parise – Haula – Coyle3:06

    xG 0.06–0.03 (69%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Staal – Niederreiter11:09

    xG 0.20–0.17 (53%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  4. Stewart – Schroeder – Haula8:26

    xG 0.10–0.23 (30%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Olofsson13:13

    xG 0.60–0.13 (82%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon15:33

    xG 0.15–0.35 (30%)attempts 7–16goals 1–0

  3. Scandella – Folin14:53

    xG 0.35–0.95 (27%)attempts 16–24goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.3 xGNSH 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #352 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.72 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +12 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).