Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 25, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Washington Capitals 2, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 61% of the time.

NSH winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH11105110226
NSH093928526

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:12WSHTom WilsonAssists: Jay Beagle, Daniel Winnik · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:56NSHRoman JosiAssists: Filip Forsberg, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:54NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Ryan Ellis · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:57NSHMike FisherPPGWGAssists: Ryan Ellis, P.K. Subban · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P3 12:07NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Ryan Johansen · Slap, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:03WSHEvgeny KuznetsovAssists: John Carlson, Justin Williams · Snap, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:08NSHViktor ArvidssonENAssists: Filip Forsberg, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.68 xG2–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:24NSHMatt Irwin: Interference2 min
  2. P1 14:56WSHTom Wilson: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 14:56NSHHarry Zolnierczyk: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:01WSHAlex Ovechkin: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 4:10WSHDmitry Orlov: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 11:17WSHAlex Ovechkin: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 12:04WSHDmitry Orlov: Holding2 min · PPG
  8. P3 13:55WSHTom Wilson: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 13:55NSHMike Fisher: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 13:55NSHMike Fisher: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 13:55WSHTom Wilson: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
44% to win56% to win
← WSH attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Backstrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHNSH
26Shots on goal26
1.8Expected goals2.3
49Shot attempts49
27Faceoffs won34
1Power plays4
17Penalty minutes11
21Hits14
12Blocked shots10
5Giveaways8
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Johansson – Kuznetsov13:36

    xG 0.53–0.19 (74%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Winnik – Beagle – Wilson6:32

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 5–8goals 1–2

  3. Ovechkin – Backstrom – Wilson2:03

    xG 0.01–0.03 (36%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Eller – Connolly – Sanford2:14

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Ness2:00

    xG 0.41–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Carlson – Orlov2:13

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Chorney – Orlov10:48

    xG 0.19–0.17 (54%)attempts 4–9goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestFisher – Smith – Fiala8:24

    xG 0.38–0.02 (95%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  2. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson11:45

    xG 0.39–0.24 (62%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  3. Wilson – Jarnkrok – Watson9:54

    xG 0.08–0.12 (39%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Fiddler – Neal – Zolnierczyk9:08

    xG 0.06–0.12 (33%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Subban – Ekholm16:45

    xG 0.50–0.46 (52%)attempts 20–17goals 0–1

  2. Weber – Irwin12:50

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  3. Josi – Ellis15:57

    xG 0.35–0.50 (41%)attempts 11–11goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.3 xGWSH 1.8 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #547 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.91 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 61% of the time.

NSH winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).