Fri, Mar 3, 2017·Honda Center, Anaheim
Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Anaheim Ducks 5
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 54% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 113 | 111 | 015 | 239 |
| ANA | 113 | 214 | 29 | 536 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 10:40ANARickard RakellAssists: Chris Wagner, Logan Shaw · Slap, 0.23 xG0–1
- P1 16:15TORZach HymanAssists: Nikita Zaitsev, William Nylander · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–1
- P2 5:53TORNazem KadriPPAssists: Tyler Bozak, Mitch Marner · Backhand, 0.30 xG2–1
- P2 9:41ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Ryan Kesler, Andrew Cogliano · Backhand, 0.18 xG2–2
- P2 9:57ANARickard RakellGWGAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Nick Ritchie · Wrist, 0.33 xG2–3
- P3 1:19ANASami VatanenAssists: Ryan Getzlaf · Slap, 0.09 xG2–4
- P3 18:46ANAPatrick EavesENAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Sami Vatanen · Wrist, 0.53 xG2–5
Penalties (5)
- P1 4:20ANACorey Perry: High sticking2 min
- P1 8:05TORMitch Marner: Tripping2 min
- P1 17:55ANAHampus Lindholm: Tripping2 min
- P2 1:30ANACorey Perry: High sticking2 min
- P2 5:36ANACorey Perry: Tripping2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Matthews
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forward lines
- bestBoyle – Martin – Soshnikov10:23
xG 0.91–0.05 (95%)attempts 25–6goals 0–0
- Hyman – Nylander – Matthews12:31
xG 0.79–0.57 (58%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0
- van Riemsdyk – Bozak – Marner10:02
xG 0.67–0.80 (45%)attempts 17–12goals 0–3
- Komarov – Kadri – Brown11:39
xG 0.11–0.85 (11%)attempts 5–16goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestGardiner – Zaitsev13:06
xG 0.68–0.45 (61%)attempts 16–13goals 1–0
- Hunwick – Rielly3:46
xG 0.21–0.14 (60%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0
- Marchenko – Rielly11:44
xG 0.50–0.78 (39%)attempts 14–18goals 0–2
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestPerry – Rakell – Ritchie9:05
xG 0.86–0.19 (82%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0
- Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg15:04
xG 1.02–0.53 (66%)attempts 21–13goals 1–0
- Getzlaf – Eaves – Kase11:59
xG 0.79–0.88 (47%)attempts 14–16goals 1–0
- Thompson – Wagner – Shaw8:17
xG 0.07–0.46 (13%)attempts 5–15goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestManson – Lindholm14:50
xG 1.53–0.55 (74%)attempts 22–16goals 2–0
- Bieksa – Fowler14:54
xG 0.45–0.60 (43%)attempts 12–18goals 1–0
- Vatanen – Fowler3:46
xG 0.00–0.23 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 54% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ANA − TOR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).