Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 7, 2017·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Philadelphia Flyers 6, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI1163925630
BUF11018116334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:34PHIMatt ReadAssists: Radko Gudas, Nick Cousins · Deflected, 0.06 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:25BUFEvander KanePPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jack Eichel · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:58PHIRadko GudasAssists: Sean Couturier · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:14BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:48PHIJordan WealAssists: Jakub Voracek, Sean Couturier · Tip-in, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:02PHIClaude GirouxGWGAssists: Michael Del Zotto, Jordan Weal · Wrist, 0.19 xG4–2
  7. P3 2:45PHIChris VandeVeldeAssists: Michael Del Zotto, Travis Konecny · Deflected, 0.12 xG5–2
  8. P3 5:21PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Radko Gudas · Wrist, 0.05 xG6–2
  9. P3 14:50BUFJack EichelAssists: Cody Franson, Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.02 xG6–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 2:41BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:41PHIPierre-Edouard Bellemare: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:52BUFJosh Gorges: Interference2 min
  4. P1 15:10PHIBrayden Schenn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 16:02BUFCody Franson: Interference2 min
  6. P1 18:33BUFJack Eichel: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 7:11PHIPierre-Edouard Bellemare: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P2 10:43PHINick Cousins: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P3 10:51PHITravis Konecny: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
44% to win56% to win
← PHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIBUF
30Shots on goal34
3.3Expected goals2.0
56Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won24
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
13Hits23
11Blocked shots17
4Giveaways11
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestRead – Cousins – Couturier9:42

    xG 0.25–0.07 (79%)attempts 10–5goals 2–0

  2. Giroux – Simmonds – Weal7:23

    xG 0.43–0.32 (57%)attempts 14–6goals 1–0

  3. VandeVelde – Bellemare – Konecny5:13

    xG 0.17–0.11 (60%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  4. Filppula – Voracek – Schenn11:57

    xG 0.17–0.79 (18%)attempts 6–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Gudas15:21

    xG 0.76–0.45 (63%)attempts 18–13goals 5–0

  2. Manning – Gostisbehere11:09

    xG 0.37–0.56 (40%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  3. MacDonald – Provorov16:39

    xG 0.26–0.54 (33%)attempts 12–20goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Reinhart – Eichel7:30

    xG 0.39–0.06 (86%)attempts 9–4goals 0–1

  2. Ennis – Deslauriers – Girgensons2:06

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Moulson – Bailey – Rodrigues2:22

    xG 0.09–0.12 (43%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Reinhart – Eichel3:35

    xG 0.09–0.15 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestFranson – Bogosian2:07

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Falk – Bogosian16:22

    xG 0.34–0.27 (55%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. Gorges – Franson9:07

    xG 0.30–0.32 (49%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.0 xGPHI 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #365 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.36 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).