Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 7, 2017·Honda Center, Anaheim

Nashville Predators 3, Anaheim Ducks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 66% of the time.

ANA winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NSH2121506040327
ANA110216015011442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:26NSHColin WilsonAssists: James Neal, Calle Jarnkrok · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:23NSHRyan EllisPPAssists: P.K. Subban, Mike Fisher · Slap, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P1 14:16ANARyan GetzlafPPAssists: Sami Vatanen, Cam Fowler · Slap, 0.51 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:29NSHFilip ForsbergSHAssists: Calle Jarnkrok · Snap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:19ANANick RitchieAssists: Patrick Eaves, Ryan Getzlaf · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:02ANARickard RakellAssists: Patrick Eaves, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Jakob Silfverberg stopped
  2. 2. NSH Ryan Ellis stopped
  3. 3. ANA Ryan Getzlaf stopped
  4. 4. NSH James Neal stopped
  5. 5. ANA Rickard Rakell stopped
  6. 6. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  7. 7. ANA Corey Perry stopped
  8. 8. NSH Viktor Arvidsson stopped
  9. 9. ANA Patrick Eaves scored
  10. 10. NSH Ryan Johansen stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:08NSHCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 3:08ANAJared Boll: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 5:12ANABrandon Montour: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 7:49ANAAndrew Cogliano: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 11:45ANARyan Kesler: Cross checking2 min
  6. P1 12:32NSHJames Neal: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  7. P1 17:09NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 17:09ANAKevin Bieksa: Fighting5 min
  9. P1 0:00ANACorey Perry: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 10:30NSHYannick Weber: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 14:18ANANick Ritchie: High sticking2 min
  12. P2 14:27NSHRoman Josi: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
44% to win56% to win
← NSH attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Jarnkrok
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHANA
27Shots on goal42
3.3Expected goals4.5
50Shot attempts90
26Faceoffs won43
5Power plays3
16Penalty minutes20
25Hits35
25Blocked shots8
12Giveaways10
9Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestFisher – Neal – Smith5:06

    xG 0.88–0.06 (93%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Fisher – Smith – Watson5:00

    xG 0.32–0.02 (95%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Neal – Wilson – Jarnkrok6:05

    xG 0.26–0.08 (76%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

  4. Wilson – Watson – Johansen2:11

    xG 0.01–0.05 (23%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm18:07

    xG 1.01–0.65 (61%)attempts 10–27goals 1–0

  2. Josi – Ekholm2:56

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Irwin7:23

    xG 0.32–0.57 (36%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Eaves – Rakell13:47

    xG 1.02–0.06 (94%)attempts 27–4goals 1–0

  2. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg9:36

    xG 0.69–0.20 (77%)attempts 16–6goals 0–1

  3. Perry – Thompson – Wagner3:40

    xG 0.04–0.05 (43%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Boll – Wagner – Shaw3:39

    xG 0.06–0.16 (26%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm10:45

    xG 0.70–0.28 (72%)attempts 21–6goals 0–1

  2. Vatanen – Manson2:04

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  3. Vatanen – Montour9:13

    xG 0.44–0.32 (58%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 4.5 xGNSH 3.3 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANANSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #308 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.73 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 66% of the time.

ANA winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).