Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 16, 2017·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Buffalo Sabres 0, Los Angeles Kings 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.

LAK winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF0209015026
LAK015010211236

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P3 0:36LAKJarome IginlaGWGAssists: Anze Kopitar, Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.32 xG0–1
  2. P3 14:40LAKAdrian KempeAssists: Drew Doughty, Dustin Brown · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 6:13LAKDrew Doughty: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 17:58BUFCody Franson: Holding2 min
  3. P3 1:37LAKTrevor Lewis: Boarding2 min
  4. P3 9:24BUFMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  5. P3 9:24LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min
  6. P3 12:33BUFJosh Gorges: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
44% to win56% to win
← BUF attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against O'Reilly
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFLAK
26Shots on goal36
1.7Expected goals3.8
57Shot attempts68
33Faceoffs won22
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
33Hits34
17Blocked shots15
8Giveaways11
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Fasching – Rodrigues6:55

    xG 0.49–0.23 (68%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. Ennis – Deslauriers – Girgensons3:06

    xG 0.06–0.21 (21%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Moulson – Reinhart – Eichel9:36

    xG 0.12–0.48 (20%)attempts 10–16goals 0–0

  4. O'Reilly – Kane – Reinhart3:02

    xG 0.00–0.36 (0%)attempts 0–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Franson – McCabe4:23

    xG 0.19–0.14 (57%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Bogosian – Fedun2:29

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Ristolainen2:41

    xG 0.04–0.17 (18%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestCarter – Toffoli – Pearson11:23

    xG 0.76–0.25 (75%)attempts 21–9goals 0–0

  2. Gaborik – Lewis – Kempe10:02

    xG 0.62–0.17 (78%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Clifford – Dowd – Andreoff7:57

    xG 0.29–0.17 (64%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Iginla – Brown – Kopitar15:52

    xG 0.71–0.63 (53%)attempts 14–18goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDoughty – Forbort18:50

    xG 1.28–0.40 (76%)attempts 25–17goals 1–0

  2. Muzzin – LaDue15:18

    xG 1.05–0.36 (75%)attempts 20–15goals 1–0

  3. Martinez – Gravel12:50

    xG 0.45–0.48 (48%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.8 xGBUF 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 1/100 · #1219 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.

LAK winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).