Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 25, 2017·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Chicago Blackhawks 0, Florida Panthers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 63% of the time.

FLA winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI090808025
FLA0831449731

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:17FLAAleksander BarkovGWGAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Jason Demers · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:21FLAJonathan HuberdeauPPAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Keith Yandle · Slap, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 11:40FLAJonathan MarchessaultAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Jonathan Huberdeau · Snap, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P3 4:59FLAJonathan MarchessaultAssists: Colton Sceviour · Slap, 0.07 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:13FLAJonathan MarchessaultAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Vincent Trocheck · Slap, 0.10 xG0–5
  6. P3 7:53FLANick BjugstadAssists: Colton Sceviour, Mark Pysyk · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–6
  7. P3 11:45FLAReilly SmithAssists: Vincent Trocheck · Slap, 0.30 xG0–7
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 6:27CHIAndrew Desjardins: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:10FLAJonathan Marchessault: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 18:58CHIRichard Panik: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 18:58FLAVincent Trocheck: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 7:20CHIRyan Hartman: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 7:20CHIRyan Hartman: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P2 9:38CHIMarcus Kruger: Interference2 min · PPG
  8. P2 12:23FLAVincent Trocheck: Interference2 min
  9. P2 14:45FLAJussi Jokinen: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 14:45CHIPatrick Kane: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 16:15FLAJonathan Marchessault: Tripping2 min
  12. P2 18:33CHIMarcus Kruger: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 6:19FLAShawn Thornton: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 6:19CHIAndrew Desjardins: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 6:19CHIRichard Panik: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 6:19FLADerek MacKenzie: Fighting5 min
  17. P3 6:19CHIRichard Panik: Game misconduct10 min
  18. P3 6:19FLADerek MacKenzie: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
44% to win56% to win
← CHI attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIFLA
25Shots on goal31
2.0Expected goals2.6
46Shot attempts48
32Faceoffs won25
3Power plays5
34Penalty minutes30
15Hits15
12Blocked shots10
12Giveaways13
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestDesjardins – Rasmussen – Kero2:42

    xG 0.38–0.03 (92%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Kane – Schmaltz – Panarin8:18

    xG 0.35–0.15 (70%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Hossa – Kruger – Hartman6:55

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Toews – Panik – Hayden6:09

    xG 0.38–0.25 (60%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Seabrook7:42

    xG 0.22–0.01 (95%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Oduya – van Riemsdyk2:21

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Seabrook3:42

    xG 0.19–0.08 (70%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Bjugstad – Marchessault3:44

    xG 0.29–0.00 (99%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Smith – Trocheck8:09

    xG 0.45–0.27 (62%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Vanek – Huberdeau – Barkov2:00

    xG 0.10–0.06 (63%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Vanek – Sceviour – Bjugstad2:48

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKindl – Pysyk14:08

    xG 0.63–0.49 (56%)attempts 13–13goals 2–0

  2. Yandle – Demers9:55

    xG 0.43–0.38 (53%)attempts 5–13goals 1–0

  3. Petrovic – Matheson14:05

    xG 0.20–0.71 (22%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.6 xGCHI 2.0 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLACHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1165 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.54 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 63% of the time.

FLA winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).