Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 25, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

San Jose Sharks 2, Nashville Predators 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 73% of the time.

NSH winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS0122808228
NSH21228314734

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:14NSHColton SissonsAssists: Colin Wilson, Craig Smith · Backhand, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:19NSHCody McLeodAssists: Roman Josi, Austin Watson · Tip-in, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:24SJSPatrick MarleauPPAssists: Brent Burns, Joe Thornton · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:48NSHJames NealPPGWGAssists: Ryan Johansen, Viktor Arvidsson · Snap, 0.17 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:39NSHP.K. SubbanAssists: Craig Smith, Colin Wilson · Slap, 0.02 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:19SJSJustin BraunAssists: Timo Meier, Dylan DeMelo · Snap, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 5:27NSHColton SissonsAssists: Craig Smith, Colin Wilson · Tip-in, 0.27 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:01NSHJames NealPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–6
  9. P3 19:22NSHViktor ArvidssonSHAssists: Matt Irwin · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–7
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 5:30SJSMicheal Haley: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 5:30NSHCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 16:55SJSJoe Pavelski: Interference2 min
  4. P2 4:14NSHMatt Irwin: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 4:41SJSMarcus Sorensen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 7:27SJSJoe Pavelski: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 7:27NSHViktor Arvidsson: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 8:11NSHColton Sissons: High sticking double minor4 min
  9. P2 9:36SJSPatrick Marleau: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 12:56NSHCalle Jarnkrok: Boarding2 min
  11. P3 12:56SJSMicheal Haley: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min · PPG
  12. P3 18:41NSHVernon Fiddler: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
44% to win56% to win
← SJS attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Jarnkrok
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSNSH
28Shots on goal34
1.8Expected goals3.0
54Shot attempts63
30Faceoffs won42
4Power plays4
23Penalty minutes17
16Hits13
17Blocked shots18
9Giveaways13
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestHaley – Sorensen – Meier4:31

    xG 0.32–0.06 (84%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Ward – Couture7:23

    xG 0.07–0.24 (23%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

  3. Boedker – Donskoi – Hertl7:10

    xG 0.02–0.22 (9%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

  4. Sorensen – Hertl – Meier2:31

    xG 0.02–0.27 (6%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchlemko – Braun10:05

    xG 0.42–0.17 (71%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Schlemko4:25

    xG 0.04–0.10 (28%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  3. Dillon – DeMelo11:27

    xG 0.20–0.39 (34%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestWilson – Smith – Sissons8:46

    xG 0.66–0.03 (95%)attempts 10–3goals 3–0

  2. Neal – Jarnkrok – Fiala10:05

    xG 0.41–0.06 (87%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson11:00

    xG 0.53–0.55 (49%)attempts 15–14goals 0–0

  4. Fiddler – McLeod – Watson7:29

    xG 0.15–0.21 (42%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm17:52

    xG 0.93–0.32 (74%)attempts 24–15goals 1–0

  2. Josi – Ellis15:23

    xG 0.58–0.24 (71%)attempts 15–11goals 2–0

  3. Weber – Irwin9:12

    xG 0.59–0.30 (67%)attempts 9–10goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.0 xGSJS 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #551 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.78 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +14 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 73% of the time.

NSH winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).