Thu, Mar 30, 2017·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul
Ottawa Senators 1, Minnesota Wild 5
Three stars
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTT | 19 | 06 | 04 | 119 |
| MIN | 18 | 27 | 211 | 526 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 16:20OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Mark Stone, Cody Ceci · Slap, 0.03 xG1–0
- P1 17:07MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Jonas Brodin, Chris Stewart · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–1
- P2 7:08MINNino NiederreiterGWGAssists: Eric Staal, Chris Stewart · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–2
- P2 17:32MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Charlie Coyle, Jared Spurgeon · Snap, 0.10 xG1–3
- P3 4:46MINMathew DumbaPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.02 xG1–4
- P3 11:53MINJason PominvilleAssists: Charlie Coyle, Martin Hanzal · Snap, 0.03 xG1–5
Penalties (6)
- P1 4:10OTTDion Phaneuf: High sticking2 min
- P1 14:18MINNino Niederreiter: Hooking2 min
- P2 4:18MINEric Staal: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
- P2 14:00MINChris Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min
- P3 2:50OTTJean-Gabriel Pageau: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 13:04MINEric Staal: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Brassard
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestPyatt – Stalberg – Pageau4:57
xG 0.24–0.01 (94%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0
- Ryan – Brassard – Dzingel5:08
xG 0.18–0.03 (85%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0
- Brassard – Hoffman – Stone3:40
xG 0.02–0.05 (32%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0
- Pyatt – Hoffman – Pageau3:07
xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestWideman – Claesson2:23
xG 0.15–0.02 (87%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Phaneuf – Claesson3:52
xG 0.11–0.02 (84%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Wideman – Jokipakka2:47
xG 0.08–0.01 (91%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0
Minnesota Wild
Forward lines
- bestStaal – Stewart – Niederreiter10:25
xG 0.42–0.09 (82%)attempts 12–5goals 2–0
- White – Haula – Eriksson Ek9:12
xG 0.37–0.07 (85%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0
- Koivu – Zucker – Granlund10:16
xG 0.26–0.12 (68%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0
- Pominville – Hanzal – Coyle8:01
xG 0.18–0.14 (57%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestSuter – Spurgeon14:26
xG 0.46–0.22 (68%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0
- Scandella – Dumba12:11
xG 0.48–0.25 (66%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0
- Brodin – Folin11:41
xG 0.28–0.10 (74%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (MIN − OTT), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).