Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 30, 2017·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Anaheim Ducks 3, Winnipeg Jets 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 81% of the time.

WPG winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA2121140200328
WPG1150721712441

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:17ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Ryan Kesler · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:54WPGJoel ArmiaSHAssists: Dustin Byfuglien · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:56ANACorey PerryAssists: Antoine Vermette, Josh Manson · Backhand, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:01ANACorey PerryPPAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Sami Vatanen · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P3 11:35WPGBlake WheelerAssists: Nikolaj Ehlers, Jacob Trouba · Snap, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:48WPGDustin ByfuglienAssists: Mathieu Perreault, Nikolaj Ehlers · Wrist, 0.31 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:34WPGMark ScheifeleGWGAssists: Dustin Byfuglien · Snap, 0.23 xG3–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:42ANAJosh Manson: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:32WPGAndrew Copp: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 16:45ANASami Vatanen: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P1 16:45WPGPatrik Laine: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:11WPGBryan Little: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 15:30ANAJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 15:30WPGNelson Nogier: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 19:44ANARickard Rakell: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 2:30ANARickard Rakell: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 17:07ANAJosh Manson: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 17:07WPGMathieu Perreault: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
44% to win56% to win
← ANA attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Scheifele
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAWPG
28Shots on goal41
1.8Expected goals3.8
44Shot attempts74
36Faceoffs won27
2Power plays4
17Penalty minutes13
14Hits25
13Blocked shots9
13Giveaways13
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestThompson – Boll – Wagner4:11

    xG 0.22–0.10 (70%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Getzlaf – Eaves – Rakell11:35

    xG 0.45–0.48 (48%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

  3. Vermette – Perry – Ritchie10:05

    xG 0.07–0.25 (21%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg9:56

    xG 0.32–0.92 (26%)attempts 10–17goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm12:29

    xG 0.88–0.42 (68%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  2. Bieksa – Vatanen11:39

    xG 0.13–0.47 (22%)attempts 4–19goals 0–0

  3. Fowler – Montour14:42

    xG 0.20–1.04 (16%)attempts 11–16goals 1–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestWheeler – Scheifele – Ehlers13:10

    xG 1.18–0.45 (72%)attempts 20–11goals 1–0

  2. Little – Perreault – Laine11:41

    xG 0.44–0.14 (75%)attempts 14–8goals 0–1

  3. Thorburn – Petan – Tanev3:13

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  4. Lowry – Armia – Copp9:20

    xG 0.29–0.36 (44%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestByfuglien – Melchiori14:45

    xG 0.98–0.40 (71%)attempts 20–8goals 0–1

  2. Trouba – Morrissey16:10

    xG 0.74–0.66 (53%)attempts 18–14goals 1–1

  3. Stuart – Nogier8:40

    xG 0.25–0.27 (49%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 3.8 xGANA 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #102 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.29 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 81% of the time.

WPG winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).