Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 8, 2017·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Columbus Blue Jackets 2, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ0725010222
PHI21021004424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:52PHIPierre-Edouard BellemareAssists: Chris VandeVelde, Roman Lyubimov · Snap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:24PHIMichael Del ZottoAssists: Brayden Schenn, Dale Weise · Wrist, 0.00 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:07CBJSeth JonesPPAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:42PHIJakub VoracekPPGWGAssists: Claude Giroux, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 13:48PHISean CouturierAssists: Ivan Provorov, Andrew MacDonald · Deflected, 0.12 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:00CBJBoone JennerAssists: Sam Gagner, Scott Hartnell · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 0:44PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 5:51CBJScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:13CBJKyle Quincey: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 13:30CBJJosh Anderson: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 13:30PHIBrandon Manning: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 13:30PHIBrandon Manning: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 13:30CBJJosh Anderson: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 1:22CBJScott Hartnell: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 7:08PHIBrandon Manning: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
44% to win56% to win
← CBJ attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Filppula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPHI
22Shots on goal24
1.3Expected goals3.2
54Shot attempts49
15Faceoffs won25
2Power plays3
13Penalty minutes11
32Hits24
15Blocked shots25
13Giveaways11
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestSaad – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg10:39

    xG 0.35–0.17 (68%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  2. Dubinsky – Foligno – Atkinson9:03

    xG 0.20–0.28 (42%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

  3. Foligno – Saad – Wennberg3:04

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Calvert – Karlsson – Anderson6:32

    xG 0.44–0.61 (42%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJones – Carlsson15:01

    xG 0.41–0.34 (54%)attempts 9–10goals 0–3

  2. Johnson – Savard17:32

    xG 0.31–0.28 (53%)attempts 15–12goals 1–0

  3. Quincey – Nutivaara12:29

    xG 0.42–1.11 (28%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Voracek – Konecny10:02

    xG 0.22–0.10 (68%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Weise – Schenn – Couturier12:05

    xG 0.52–0.44 (55%)attempts 8–10goals 2–0

  3. VandeVelde – Bellemare – Lyubimov8:43

    xG 0.08–0.03 (74%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  4. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal10:45

    xG 0.37–0.44 (46%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Del Zotto11:41

    xG 0.70–0.18 (80%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  2. MacDonald – Provorov11:54

    xG 0.36–0.04 (91%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Gostisbehere – Provorov2:19

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.2 xGCBJ 1.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 41/100 · #676 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 55% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 84% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).