Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 9, 2017·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Colorado Avalanche 2, St. Louis Blues 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL03216015234
STL16010211327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:37STLZachary SanfordAssists: Dmitrij Jaskin · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:03COLFrancois BeaucheminAssists: Sven Andrighetto, Nathan MacKinnon · Tip-in, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 15:02COLMikko RantanenAssists: Erik Johnson · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:20STLVladimir SobotkaAssists: Jori Lehtera, Magnus Paajarvi · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–2
  5. P3 4:39STLVladimir TarasenkoGWGAssists: Ivan Barbashev · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:57COLTyson Barrie: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:59COLPatrick Wiercioch: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 16:47COLMikhail Grigorenko: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 0:11COLMikko Rantanen: Holding2 min
  5. P3 12:41STLZachary Sanford: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 15:17STLPatrik Berglund: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
44% to win56% to win
← COL attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Berglund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLSTL
34Shots on goal27
2.1Expected goals2.7
57Shot attempts51
29Faceoffs won32
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
13Hits15
16Blocked shots11
4Giveaways5
11Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestAndrighetto – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:14

    xG 0.64–0.37 (63%)attempts 13–11goals 2–0

  2. Comeau – Soderberg – Grigorenko7:28

    xG 0.17–0.17 (49%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Duchene – Nieto – Compher11:06

    xG 0.47–0.56 (46%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  4. Bourque – Landeskog – Jost7:25

    xG 0.16–0.33 (32%)attempts 7–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Barberio14:31

    xG 0.58–0.26 (69%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Goloubef – Wiercioch8:43

    xG 0.15–0.28 (35%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Barrie12:12

    xG 0.18–0.37 (33%)attempts 10–13goals 1–1

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSobotka – Lehtera – Paajarvi4:27

    xG 0.52–0.11 (82%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Tarasenko – Schwartz – Barbashev5:34

    xG 0.25–0.17 (60%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Lehtera – Paajarvi – Barbashev3:58

    xG 0.06–0.10 (35%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

  4. Reaves – Jaskin – Sanford11:26

    xG 0.19–0.25 (43%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Parayko13:39

    xG 0.67–0.58 (54%)attempts 10–14goals 1–1

  2. Gunnarsson – Schmaltz11:44

    xG 0.33–0.31 (51%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Butler16:16

    xG 0.29–0.68 (30%)attempts 12–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 2.7 xGCOL 2.1 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #485 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.73 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 63% of the time.

STL winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).