Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 5, 2017·United Center, Chicago

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, Chicago Blackhawks 10

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 75% of the time.

CHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT01211403129
CHI521314291044

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:21CHIRyan HartmanAssists: Patrick Kane, Michal Kempny · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:06CHIBrandon SaadGWGAssists: Richard Panik · Deflected, 0.27 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:34CHINick SchmaltzAssists: Patrick Kane, Ryan Hartman · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P1 9:16CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.24 xG0–4
  5. P1 17:01CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Artem Anisimov, Alex DeBrincat · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–5
  6. P2 2:05PITPhil KesselPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–5
  7. P2 3:49CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Ryan Hartman, Gustav Forsling · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–6
  8. P2 9:18CHIRichard PanikAssists: Nick Schmaltz, Jan Rutta · Wrist, 0.30 xG1–7
  9. P2 10:40CHINick SchmaltzAssists: Patrick Kane, Ryan Hartman · Slap, 0.05 xG1–8
  10. P3 5:21CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Jonathan Toews, Brent Seabrook · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–9
  11. P3 13:45CHIBrent SeabrookAssists: John Hayden, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–10
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 19:58PITKris Letang: Interference2 min
  2. P2 0:27CHIJonathan Toews: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:22CHIJan Rutta: Interference2 min
  4. P2 4:21PITCarl Hagelin: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 7:12PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 11:28PITJustin Schultz: Holding2 min
  7. P2 14:57PITCarl Hagelin: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 17:33PITPhil Kessel: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 17:50PITTom Kuhnhackl: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 17:50PITRyan Reaves: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCHI
29Shots on goal44
2.2Expected goals3.6
50Shot attempts75
32Faceoffs won39
2Power plays6
32Penalty minutes4
38Hits27
24Blocked shots13
9Giveaways11
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Kessel – Rust4:51

    xG 0.46–0.16 (75%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  2. Malkin – Kessel – Hagelin6:27

    xG 0.29–0.24 (55%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  3. McKegg – Wilson – Sheary3:23

    xG 0.11–0.18 (39%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  4. Reaves – Kuhnhackl – Rowney3:26

    xG 0.00–0.11 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHunwick – Cole5:20

    xG 0.65–0.30 (69%)attempts 6–9goals 0–1

  2. Hunwick – Maatta7:15

    xG 0.29–0.26 (52%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Schultz8:07

    xG 0.14–0.47 (23%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Panik – Saad6:45

    xG 1.02–0.06 (95%)attempts 13–6goals 3–0

  2. Bouma – Hayden – Kero5:02

    xG 0.26–0.03 (89%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. Sharp – Anisimov – DeBrincat10:53

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  4. Kane – Hartman – Schmaltz8:32

    xG 0.61–0.73 (45%)attempts 13–7goals 3–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook13:27

    xG 1.44–0.08 (95%)attempts 21–7goals 3–0

  2. Forsling – Rutta12:22

    xG 0.78–0.54 (59%)attempts 16–14goals 2–0

  3. Kempny – Rutta4:28

    xG 0.26–0.08 (76%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.6 xGPIT 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1112 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.49 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 75% of the time.

CHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).