Mon, Oct 9, 2017·Honda Center, Anaheim
Calgary Flames 2, Anaheim Ducks 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 51% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY | 010 | 110 | 19 | 229 |
| ANA | 09 | 017 | 017 | 043 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 16:27CGYSean MonahanPPGWGAssists: Kris Versteeg, Johnny Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
- P3 6:19CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Michael Frolik, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
Penalties (11)
- P1 3:45CGYMichael Stone: Holding2 min
- P1 5:06CGYSam Bennett: Slashing2 min
- P1 6:10ANACorey Perry: Cross checking2 min
- P1 6:10ANACorey Perry: Fighting5 min
- P1 6:10CGYTravis Hamonic: Fighting5 min
- P1 15:09ANACam Fowler: Cross checking2 min
- P2 4:16ANARyan Getzlaf: Roughing2 min
- P2 15:27ANAKevin Bieksa: Cross checking2 min · PPG
- P3 1:07CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Interference goalkeeper2 min
- P3 10:07CGYTroy Brouwer: Hooking2 min
- P3 16:29CGYMikael Backlund: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Monahan
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestFerland – Gaudreau – Monahan4:13
xG 0.62–0.03 (95%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0
- Frolik – Backlund – Tkachuk11:03
xG 0.50–0.42 (54%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0
- Versteeg – Lazar – Bennett4:46
xG 0.24–0.19 (56%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0
- Versteeg – Ferland – Monahan4:36
xG 0.14–0.27 (33%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGiordano – Hamilton12:20
xG 0.82–0.44 (65%)attempts 23–16goals 1–0
- Stone – Bartkowski8:42
xG 0.70–0.45 (61%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
- Stone – Brodie2:49
xG 0.10–0.09 (53%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0
Anaheim Ducks
Forward lines
- bestSilfverberg – Rakell – Rasmussen5:57
xG 0.47–0.19 (72%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0
- Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell3:46
xG 0.10–0.03 (75%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Getzlaf – Perry – Cogliano7:41
xG 0.40–0.39 (51%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1
- Vermette – Wagner – Shaw7:57
xG 0.29–0.68 (30%)attempts 11–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestFowler – Manson12:55
xG 0.52–0.36 (59%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0
- Beauchemin – Montour14:02
xG 0.85–0.93 (48%)attempts 17–18goals 0–1
- Bieksa – Megna11:25
xG 0.36–0.87 (29%)attempts 11–16goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 51% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (ANA − CGY), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).