Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 14, 2017·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Washington Capitals 2, Philadelphia Flyers 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

PHI winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH191707223
PHI213311313837

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:18PHISean CouturierAssists: Jakub Voracek, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.31 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:25WSHJakub VranaAssists: Evgeny Kuznetsov, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:58PHIScott LaughtonSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:15PHIWayne SimmondsPPGWGAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Snap, 0.21 xG1–3
  5. P2 10:32PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Sean Couturier, Jakub Voracek · Deflected, 0.14 xG1–4
  6. P2 10:45WSHNicklas BackstromAssists: T.J. Oshie, Brooks Orpik · Snap, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P2 17:05PHIValtteri FilppulaAssists: Jordan Weal, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–5
  8. P3 8:28PHIScott LaughtonAssists: Ivan Provorov · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–6
  9. P3 9:45PHISean CouturierAssists: Claude Giroux, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–7
  10. P3 15:23PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Brandon Manning, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–8
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:59PHIBrandon Manning: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 16:06WSHJohn Carlson: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 17:05PHITravis Konecny: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P2 2:42WSHJohn Carlson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 11:33PHIRadko Gudas: Misconduct10 min
  6. P3 11:33WSHTom Wilson: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← WSH attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Filppula
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHPHI
23Shots on goal37
1.6Expected goals3.0
52Shot attempts57
28Faceoffs won32
2Power plays2
14Penalty minutes14
20Hits23
10Blocked shots16
11Giveaways11
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. Beagle – Smith-Pelly – Wilson2:12

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Beagle – Chiasson – Smith-Pelly6:09

    xG 0.05–0.08 (36%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Oshie – Backstrom – Burakovsky10:29

    xG 0.19–0.23 (45%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  4. Eller – Connolly – Wilson5:09

    xG 0.03–0.11 (20%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarlson – Djoos12:46

    xG 0.50–0.32 (61%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Orpik – Ness4:04

    xG 0.13–0.14 (48%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

  3. Ness – Orlov12:00

    xG 0.35–0.51 (41%)attempts 13–13goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Voracek – Couturier12:08

    xG 1.20–0.46 (72%)attempts 20–9goals 4–1

  2. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal12:10

    xG 0.57–0.14 (80%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  3. Laughton – Leier – Raffl10:14

    xG 0.13–0.06 (69%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  4. Weise – Konecny – Patrick12:21

    xG 0.50–0.56 (47%)attempts 12–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Hagg16:59

    xG 0.66–0.26 (72%)attempts 18–13goals 1–0

  2. MacDonald – Provorov16:02

    xG 0.89–0.51 (63%)attempts 17–14goals 2–1

  3. Manning – Gudas12:30

    xG 0.31–0.15 (68%)attempts 8–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.0 xGWSH 1.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #606 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 76% of the time.

PHI winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).