Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 17, 2017·Madison Square Garden, New York

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, New York Rangers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 64% of the time.

NYR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT2121111911533
NYR0103811400432

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:43PITPhil KesselAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Ian Cole · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 13:30PITCarl HagelinAssists: Olli Maatta · Snap, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P2 6:02NYRDavid DesharnaisAssists: J.T. Miller, Kevin Shattenkirk · Snap, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:32NYRPavel BuchnevichPPAssists: Mika Zibanejad, Mats Zuccarello · Slap, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:32NYRJ.T. MillerPPAssists: Ryan McDonagh, Tony DeAngelo · Slap, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:01PITPatric HornqvistPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Evgeni Malkin · Tip-in, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P3 8:00NYRMichael GrabnerAssists: David Desharnais, J.T. Miller · Snap, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:04PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. OT 0:58PITEvgeni MalkinGWGAssists: Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 9:15PITGreg McKegg: Holding2 min
  2. P2 2:12NYRChris Kreider: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 6:31PITSidney Crosby: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:32PITSidney Crosby: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 14:35PITCarl Hagelin: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 16:19NYRChris Kreider: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 18:45NYRDavid Desharnais: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 4:52PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 4:52NYRKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 9:11PITBryan Rust: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 9:11NYRKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 15:03PITChad Ruhwedel: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYR
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackNYR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNYR
33Shots on goal32
2.8Expected goals3.6
50Shot attempts63
29Faceoffs won30
3Power plays6
16Penalty minutes10
20Hits25
17Blocked shots11
10Giveaways23
7Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Hagelin – McKegg7:28

    xG 0.12–0.02 (88%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – Guentzel – Sheary9:07

    xG 0.39–0.40 (49%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

  3. Malkin – Kessel – Rust10:02

    xG 0.35–0.39 (48%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  4. Reaves – Kuhnhackl – Rowney2:52

    xG 0.06–0.22 (20%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Cole – Schultz10:47

    xG 0.67–0.71 (49%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0

  2. Maatta – Ruhwedel11:57

    xG 0.36–0.43 (46%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  3. Letang – Dumoulin13:11

    xG 0.18–0.59 (23%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Zuccarello – Zibanejad8:31

    xG 0.65–0.20 (77%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  2. Cracknell – Grabner – Buchnevich4:23

    xG 0.34–0.06 (86%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Kreider – Miller8:11

    xG 0.18–0.10 (64%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  4. Hayes – Fast – Vesey10:40

    xG 0.39–0.40 (49%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStaal – Shattenkirk10:58

    xG 0.53–0.28 (66%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. McDonagh – DeAngelo11:37

    xG 0.68–0.52 (57%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  3. Smith – Skjei10:42

    xG 0.23–0.35 (39%)attempts 5–11goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYR 3.6 xGPIT 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYRPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #21 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.87 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NYR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 64% of the time.

NYR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NYR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).