Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 17, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Colorado Avalanche 1, Nashville Predators 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 88% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL081607121
NSH07314113434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:09COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Mikko Rantanen · Deflected, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:07NSHViktor ArvidssonAssists: Filip Forsberg, Alexei Emelin · Backhand, 0.15 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:30NSHRoman JosiPPGWGAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Filip Forsberg · Wrist, 0.42 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:15NSHColton SissonsAssists: Craig Smith, Roman Josi · Backhand, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:08NSHAustin WatsonAssists: Alexei Emelin · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:09NSHPontus Aberg: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 4:28COLErik Johnson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 16:35NSHColton Sissons: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 3:23NSHPontus Aberg: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 12:04COLMatt Duchene: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  6. P2 13:11COLGabriel Landeskog: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 13:53NSHRoman Josi: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 17:48NSHScott Hartnell: Delaying game2 min
  9. P2 18:27COLTyson Barrie: Holding2 min
  10. P2 19:15NSHColton Sissons: Charging2 min
  11. P3 8:03COLCarl Soderberg: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 17:37COLNail Yakupov: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNSH
21Shots on goal34
1.6Expected goals4.3
43Shot attempts59
19Faceoffs won35
6Power plays5
12Penalty minutes12
10Hits23
10Blocked shots11
6Giveaways14
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestAndrighetto – MacKinnon – Rantanen5:13

    xG 0.11–0.02 (83%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Comeau – Soderberg – Jost3:58

    xG 0.12–0.06 (66%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Duchene – Yakupov – Kerfoot5:53

    xG 0.09–0.20 (32%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Wilson – Landeskog – Compher5:33

    xG 0.03–0.31 (9%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarrie – Lindholm6:43

    xG 0.19–0.08 (70%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Barrie – Bigras5:18

    xG 0.14–0.08 (64%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Barberio3:50

    xG 0.11–0.08 (58%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson9:45

    xG 0.61–0.10 (86%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Smith – Sissons – Fiala10:01

    xG 0.49–0.28 (64%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. McLeod – Watson – Gaudreau4:08

    xG 0.30–0.18 (63%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0

  4. Hartnell – Jarnkrok – Aberg7:39

    xG 0.10–0.11 (47%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEmelin – Subban11:12

    xG 0.80–0.09 (90%)attempts 14–8goals 2–0

  2. Josi – Ekholm12:16

    xG 0.60–0.14 (81%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Subban – Ekholm2:47

    xG 0.06–0.12 (32%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 4.3 xGCOL 1.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 33/100 · #862 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 88% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).