Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 20, 2017·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Florida Panthers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT011322115448
FLA21101317331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:15FLAJamie McGinnAssists: Radim Vrbata, Vincent Trocheck · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:49FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Keith Yandle, Aaron Ekblad · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:14PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Phil Kessel, Kris Letang · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:41PITCarter RowneyAssists: Tom Kuhnhackl · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:12PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Phil Kessel · Tip-in, 0.18 xG3–2
  6. P3 9:19FLAMacKenzie WeegarAssists: Mark Pysyk, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:07PITConor ShearyPPGWGAssists: Olli Maatta, Justin Schultz · Backhand, 0.11 xG4–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 0:07PITIan Cole: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 16:30PITPhil Kessel: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 2:07FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Slashing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 9:37FLAAlexander Petrovic: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:56FLADerek MacKenzie: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 15:36FLARadim Vrbata: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Trocheck won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITFLA
48Shots on goal31
3.5Expected goals2.5
68Shot attempts57
31Faceoffs won43
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
21Hits20
16Blocked shots13
8Giveaways9
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Hornqvist – Hagelin10:21

    xG 0.76–0.08 (90%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Kessel – Rust12:38

    xG 0.38–0.26 (60%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  3. Reaves – Kuhnhackl – Rowney8:25

    xG 0.23–0.14 (62%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Guentzel – Sheary2:27

    xG 0.07–0.11 (39%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Maatta11:54

    xG 1.00–0.18 (85%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin14:48

    xG 0.39–0.17 (70%)attempts 13–8goals 0–2

  3. Cole – Schultz5:05

    xG 0.32–0.23 (58%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestDadonov – Huberdeau – Barkov15:17

    xG 0.89–0.21 (81%)attempts 15–9goals 2–0

  2. Bjugstad – McCann – Tippett6:21

    xG 0.21–0.25 (46%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. MacKenzie – Sceviour – Haley5:22

    xG 0.06–0.16 (28%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  4. Vrbata – McGinn – Trocheck11:55

    xG 0.35–0.95 (27%)attempts 10–17goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Pysyk – Weegar12:36

    xG 0.61–0.56 (52%)attempts 13–14goals 2–1

  2. Petrovic – Matheson15:17

    xG 0.21–0.42 (33%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  3. Yandle – Ekblad17:59

    xG 0.70–1.07 (39%)attempts 13–19goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.5 xGPIT 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #181 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.11 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

FLA winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).