Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 20, 2017·Honda Center, Anaheim

Montréal Canadiens 2, Anaheim Ducks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 75% of the time.

ANA winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL07230014251
ANA321010314645

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:46ANADennis RasmussenAssists: Jaycob Megna, Kevin Bieksa · Tip-in, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:46ANADerek GrantPPAssists: Francois Beauchemin, Brandon Montour · Wrist, 0.45 xG0–2
  3. P1 13:42ANAAntoine VermetteGWGAssists: Chris Wagner · Slap, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:47MTLPaul ByronAssists: Karl Alzner, Jordie Benn · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:24MTLBrendan GallagherPPAssists: Victor Mete, Jeff Petry · Backhand, 0.30 xG2–3
  6. P3 5:58ANABrandon MontourAssists: Kevin Bieksa, Jakob Silfverberg · Slap, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:12ANADerek GrantAssists: Ondrej Kase, Nick Ritchie · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–5
  8. P3 7:35ANAChris WagnerAssists: Corey Perry, Antoine Vermette · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–6
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 2:43MTLAlex Galchenyuk: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 4:11MTLAndrew Shaw: Cross checking2 min
  3. P1 4:11MTLAndrew Shaw: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 4:11ANANick Ritchie: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 4:11ANANick Ritchie: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 0:25ANAAntoine Vermette: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 3:13ANAOndrej Kase: Delaying game bench face off violation2 min
  8. P2 10:48ANAKevin Bieksa: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 16:02ANAFrancois Beauchemin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 8:40ANAKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 8:40ANAKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 8:40MTLAndrew Shaw: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 8:40ANAKevin Bieksa: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 8:40ANANick Ritchie: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 11:14MTLMax Pacioretty: Tripping2 min
  16. P3 15:26MTLJoe Morrow: High sticking2 min
  17. P3 18:04MTLTomas Plekanec: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Grant won the faceoff against Danault
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLANA
51Shots on goal45
5.0Expected goals3.2
80Shot attempts63
28Faceoffs won49
6Power plays4
22Penalty minutes36
26Hits24
9Blocked shots12
15Giveaways12
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPacioretty – Shaw – Danault7:16

    xG 0.89–0.05 (94%)attempts 11–3goals 0–0

  2. Plekanec – Gallagher – Lehkonen3:25

    xG 0.27–0.07 (81%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Plekanec – Byron – Gallagher3:04

    xG 0.22–0.04 (86%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Plekanec – Byron – Hudon2:50

    xG 0.11–0.11 (49%)attempts 2–1goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Mete15:41

    xG 1.47–0.68 (68%)attempts 25–21goals 0–2

  2. Petry – Morrow5:48

    xG 0.48–0.09 (84%)attempts 9–3goals 0–0

  3. Alzner – Benn7:51

    xG 0.31–0.36 (47%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestBoll – Shaw – Rasmussen2:34

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  2. Grant – Ritchie – Kase8:36

    xG 0.44–0.29 (60%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  3. Vermette – Perry – Wagner10:59

    xG 0.49–0.89 (36%)attempts 14–13goals 2–1

  4. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell12:46

    xG 0.34–0.84 (29%)attempts 12–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Megna7:30

    xG 0.72–0.17 (81%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0

  2. Beauchemin – Bieksa3:08

    xG 0.16–0.13 (55%)attempts 3–2goals 0–1

  3. Bieksa – Megna7:08

    xG 0.51–0.53 (49%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.2 xGMTL 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #425 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.88 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 75% of the time.

ANA winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).