Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 21, 2017·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Minnesota Wild 4, Calgary Flames 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN08113311432
CGY01818111237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:49MINChris StewartPPAssists: Ryan Suter, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–0
  2. P2 19:32CGYSean MonahanAssists: Troy Brouwer, TJ Brodie · Snap, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P3 0:43CGYKris VersteegPPAssists: TJ Brodie, Johnny Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.34 xG1–2
  4. P3 10:33MINRyan SuterAssists: Eric Staal, Luke Kunin · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P3 12:08MINJared SpurgeonGWGAssists: Ryan Suter, Mikko Koivu · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:57MINDaniel WinnikENAssists: Luke Kunin · Backhand, 0.60 xG4–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 0:47MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 4:53CGYDougie Hamilton: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 7:21MINGustav Olofsson: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 14:14MINMikko Koivu: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 2:50CGYMichael Stone: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 3:33CGYTroy Brouwer: Interference2 min
  7. P2 19:32MINChris Stewart: Delaying game bench2 min · PPG
  8. P3 0:23MINRyan Suter: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 16:23MINKyle Quincey: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Cullen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCGY
32Shots on goal37
3.5Expected goals4.0
54Shot attempts74
31Faceoffs won31
3Power plays6
12Penalty minutes6
11Hits15
22Blocked shots10
4Giveaways11
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Stewart – Zucker10:13

    xG 0.66–0.24 (73%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Foligno – Kunin8:27

    xG 0.41–0.27 (60%)attempts 11–7goals 1–1

  3. Cullen – Winnik – Eriksson Ek9:33

    xG 0.14–0.13 (52%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  4. O'Reilly – Ennis – Mitchell6:35

    xG 0.11–0.30 (27%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Olofsson10:31

    xG 0.89–0.16 (85%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Quincey – Dumba10:33

    xG 0.33–0.29 (54%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon17:43

    xG 0.31–0.73 (30%)attempts 14–25goals 2–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestVersteeg – Brouwer – Hamilton6:15

    xG 0.32–0.11 (75%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Versteeg – Lazar – Bennett2:41

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Ferland – Gaudreau – Monahan7:23

    xG 0.25–0.23 (52%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

  4. Ferland – Lazar – Bennett2:33

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hamonic – Brodie17:19

    xG 0.50–0.55 (48%)attempts 16–18goals 1–1

  2. Stone – Kulak8:25

    xG 0.14–0.29 (32%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

  3. Giordano – Hamilton13:49

    xG 0.52–0.79 (39%)attempts 18–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 4.0 xGMIN 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #342 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.03 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 15% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).